CVE-2025-46859
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. A low-privileged attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form inputs, which persists in the system and executes when other users view the affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine AEM versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or use the Version manifest at /system/console/bundles or check the crx-quickstart/packageMgr.xml file for the installed version stringAffected if The installed version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0
-
Identify form field componentsReview the AEM Forms or Adaptive Forms implementation in the /libs or /apps directories. Check form field components for presence of input validation or output encoding settingsAffected if Form fields lack proper output encoding or input validation on user-controllable fields
-
Audit user group permissionsUse the AEM User Admin console at /security/useradmin to examine group permissions for low-privileged users. Verify if standard users can access and submit forms that persist dataAffected if Low-privileged users have create or modify permissions on form content nodes in the repository
-
Scan for existing XSS payloadsQuery the repository for stored script tags using CRXDE Lite search or a repository export. Look for <script> tags, javascript: URLs, or event handlers in form submission data nodes under /content or /varAffected if Malicious script content is found persisted in form data nodes
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 (or below 2025.5.0) AND your forms accept user input that is stored without output encoding, allowing a low-privileged attacker to inject persistent malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to a version newer than 6.5.22. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation on form fields as a defense-in-depth measure until the patch can be applied.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 (for 6.5.x on-premises) or 2025.5.0 (for Cloud Service)
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use (check /system/console/info or CRXDE Lite version properties)
- 2. Determine which release line applies to your instance: 6.5.x (on-premises) or Cloud Service (2025.x release train)
- 3. For AEM 6.5.x on-premises: Plan upgrade to version 6.5.23.0
- 4. For AEM as a Cloud Service: Plan upgrade to version 2025.5.0 or later
- 5. Create a full backup of the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configurations
- 6. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 7. Review Adobe's release notes for 6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0 for any migration requirements or configuration changes
- 8. Execute the upgrade following Adobe's standard upgrade documentation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46859 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46859 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data