CVE-2025-46870
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in form fields. A low-privileged attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into form inputs, which persists on the server and executes in victims' browsers when they view the affected page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager versionNavigate to AEM Welcome page > Tools > Operations > Diagnosis, or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder. You can also access /system/console/bundles to view the AEM core bundle version.Affected if Installed version is below 6.5.23.0 for 6.x releases, or below 2025.5.0 for cloud/2025 releases
-
Identify form field components in useReview the AEM instance for use of form components such as Adaptive Forms, Core Form components (form-text, form-hidden, form-checkbox), or custom form implementations in /apps or /content.Affected if The instance uses form input components that accept user-generated content
-
Search for stored XSS payloads in form dataUse AEM Query Builder or CRXDE Lite to search nodes under /content for suspicious script tags in form field values. Example query: path=/content type=nt:unstructured property=jcr:content property.value=%3Cscript%3EAffected if Malicious JavaScript payloads are found persisted in form field repository nodes
-
Review form field input validationInspect the form component's edit dialog configuration (dialog.xml or .xml) under /apps for missing input validation rules or client-side libraries that perform output encoding.Affected if Form components lack server-side input validation or output encoding is not applied to stored values
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 and the system uses form fields that accept user input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Apply the vendor patch or upgrade to a fixed version of AEM (6.5.23 or later). Implement output encoding on form fields and consider Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
AEM 6.5.23.0+ (6.x line) or 2025.5.0+ (Cloud Service)
- Backup your AEM instance and database before proceeding with any upgrade
- Review the Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 release notes and migration guide at helpx.adobe.com for any specific migration requirements
- For AEM 6.5.x users: Upgrade to version 6.5.23.0 or later
- For AEM as a Cloud Service users: Upgrade to version 2025.5.0 or later
- After upgrade, verify the XSS protection filters are working correctly by testing form field inputs
- Test critical workflows and templates to ensure functionality is preserved post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46870 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46870 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data