CVE-2025-46893
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.22 and earlier allows low-privilege attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The malicious payload persists on the server and executes in victims' browsers when they view affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed AEM versionAccess the AEM System Information console at /system/console/status-AEMProductInfo or check the About Adobe Experience Manager page (Help > About). Note the exact version number displayed.Affected if The version is less than 6.5.23.0 (for 6.5.x branch) or less than 2025.5.0 (for cloud/release branch)
-
Verify AEM 6.5.x version if applicableIf running the 6.5.x release line, confirm the full version string includes 6.5.23.0 or later. Versions 6.5.22.0 and earlier are affected.Affected if Running AEM 6.5.22.0 or any earlier 6.5.x version
-
Verify AEM 2025.x version if applicableIf running the 2025 release line, confirm the version is 2025.5.0 or later. Versions before 2025.5.0 are affected.Affected if Running any AEM 2025.x version prior to 2025.5.0
-
Identify custom or adaptive forms accepting user inputReview form components in AEM content structures. Check for Adaptive Forms, Core Components with form fields, or custom form implementations under /content or /apps that accept user-submitted data.Affected if Forms exist that accept user input and the AEM version is within the affected ranges
-
Check form field output encodingSubmit a benign test payload (such as <script>alert(1)</script> or <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>) into a form field and then view the submitted data or the page containing that data. Inspect the page source to see if the payload is rendered as plain text or executed as JavaScript.Affected if The test payload executes as JavaScript when viewed, indicating lack of output encoding
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 (6.5.x branch) or below 2025.5.0 (2025 branch) and you have form fields that accept user input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Apply Adobe's security patch (AEM 6.5.23 or later) to address the vulnerability. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation on form fields as a defense-in-depth measure.
6.5.23.0 (LTS) or 2025.5.0 (modern release)
- 1. Identify current Adobe Experience Manager version via /system/console/config or AEM startup logs
- 2. Determine which release track you're on (6.5.x LTS or 2025.x cloud-aligned releases)
- 3. Review Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23 release notes for your specific deployment type
- 4. Create a full backup of AEM repository (crx-quickstart) and database
- 5. Test upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 6. Schedule maintenance window and inform users
- 7. Run the upgrade installer for version 6.5.23.0 (for 6.5.x track) or 2025.5.0 (for modern release track)
- 8. After upgrade, clear dispatcher cache and browser caches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46893 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46893 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data