Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2025-4692

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Actors can use a maliciously crafted JavaScript object notation (JSON) web token (JWT) to perform privilege escalation by submitting the malicious JWT to a vulnerable method exposed on the cloud platform. If the exploit is successful, the user can escalate privileges to access any device managed by the ABUP Cloud Update Platform.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the ABUP Cloud Update Platform where the authentication mechanism fails to properly validate maliciously crafted JWTs. An attacker can submit a crafted JWT to a vulnerable endpoint to elevate their privileges and gain unauthorized access to devices managed by the platform.

MitigationImplement robust JWT signature validation with proper algorithm verification (disable algorithm confusion), enforce strict issuer and audience validation, and verify user permissions/roles from trusted sources rather than trusting JWT claims alone.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm ABUP Cloud Update Platform deployment
    Inventory all cloud update/IoT management platforms in your environment and verify whether any instance is running the ABUP Cloud Update Platform
    Affected if ABUP Cloud Update Platform is present and handles device authentication
  2. Identify JWT authentication endpoints
    Review your API/service documentation and network traffic logs to locate endpoints that accept JWT tokens for authentication, particularly those related to device management or platform access
    Affected if JWT-based authentication is used for device or platform access
  3. Inspect JWT signature validation logic
    Examine the authentication middleware or service code that processes JWT tokens. Look for the jwt.verify() or equivalent function calls and check whether signature algorithm is explicitly restricted
    Affected if JWT validation does not enforce a specific, secure algorithm (such as HS256 or RS256) or allows algorithm confusion (accepting 'none' or switching algorithms)
  4. Review JWT issuer and audience validation
    Check the JWT validation code for claims verification: inspect whether the 'iss' (issuer) and 'aud' (audience) claims are validated against expected trusted values
    Affected if JWT claims are accepted without verifying issuer, audience, or user role from a trusted source
  5. Check for exposed authentication endpoints
    Identify and test public-facing API endpoints that accept JWT tokens. Determine if these endpoints process tokens without full validation or allow privilege escalation via role claims
    Affected if Endpoints accept and process JWTs without validating permissions from a backend trusted source

Your environment is affected if you run the ABUP Cloud Update Platform and your JWT authentication does not enforce strict algorithm restrictions, issuer/audience validation, and permission verification from trusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement robust JWT signature validation with proper algorithm verification (disable algorithm confusion), enforce strict issuer and audience validation, and verify user permissions/roles from trusted sources rather than trusting JWT claims alone.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4692 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4692 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data