CVE-2025-46936
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. A low-privilege authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form inputs, which persists on the page and executes in the browsers of users who view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AEM versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or check the product version through the system console (Help > About Adobe Experience Manager). Compare the displayed version against the affected ranges: below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.22 or earlier, or falls below 6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0.
-
Identify low-privilege user accountsReview user permissions in the AEM User Management console (Tools > Security > Users or Tools > Security > Groups). Determine if users with limited or contributor-level permissions have the ability to create or edit content containing form fields.Affected if Low-privilege authenticated users exist and have write access to form-enabled content.
-
Locate form field componentsReview the AEM instance for components that accept user-generated input in forms, such as text fields, textarea, or custom form containers. Check if these components are exposed in any accessible content pages or templates.Affected if Form input components are present and accessible to low-privilege users for content creation.
-
Verify content creation accessTest whether a low-privilege user can create or edit pages containing form fields. Log in with a test low-privilege account and attempt to add content with form components to confirm the attack surface exists.Affected if Low-privilege users can create or edit content with form input fields on published pages.
Your environment is affected if AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 AND low-privilege authenticated users can access and inject content into form fields that are rendered on accessible pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.23 or later. As a temporary measure, implement strict input validation and output encoding on all form fields, and restrict low-privilege user permissions until the patch is applied.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 or later (6.5.x line); Adobe Experience Manager 2025.5.0 or later (cloud/2025 line)
- Back up the current Adobe Experience Manager instance and all content repositories
- Download Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 (for 6.5.x customers) or 2025.5.0 (for cloud customers) from the official Adobe distribution portal
- Install the updated AEM version following Adobe's standard upgrade documentation
- After upgrade, verify the version number reflects the patched release (6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0)
- Test that form functionality works correctly and the XSS vulnerability is no longer exploitable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46936 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46936 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data