CVE-2025-46964
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier allows low-privileged users to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The injected payload persists in the system and executes in victim browsers when they view pages containing the compromised fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed AEM versionNavigate to AEM Welcome page > Help > Version, or access /system/console/systeminfo, or check version.properties in crx-quickstartAffected if Version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 (for cloud/2025 releases)
-
Verify Forms or Adaptive Forms module is enabledCheck if AEM Forms add-on is installed by navigating to /libs/granite/core/content/login.html or checking package manager for aem-forms-* packagesAffected if AEM Forms or Adaptive Forms feature is installed and active
-
Identify form-enabled content pathsSearch for Adaptive Form fragments or Form data model objects in crx/de lite under /content/forms or /content/dam/formsAffected if Form content exists in the repository under /content/forms or related paths
-
Inspect user permission levels for formsCheck user/group permissions in AEM Groups console or crx/explorer for users with 'content-author' or 'forms-user' assignmentsAffected if Low-privileged users (non-admin) have write access to form content or form fragments
-
Audit existing form field content for malicious payloadsUse crx/de lite to search jcr:content nodes under /content/forms for script tags, javascript:, or event handlers in text fieldsAffected if Any form field content contains unsanitized HTML/script tags or XSS attempt patterns
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 AND Forms/Adaptive Forms are enabled with low-privileged users having write access to form fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to a version newer than 6.5.22, or apply the relevant security patch. Implement input validation and output encoding on form fields as a defense-in-depth measure.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0 (or later)
- Confirm current Adobe Experience Manager version by accessing the AEM welcome page or checking the version.properties file
- Download Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 (for 6.5.x branch) or 2025.5.0 (for cloud/continuous release) from the official Adobe Software Distribution portal
- Review the Adobe Experience Manager release notes for version 6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0 for any specific migration or upgrade considerations
- Perform a full backup of the current AEM instance including the repository, database, and configuration files
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to verify compatibility with custom code and integrations
- Execute the upgrade following Adobe's standard upgrade procedure for AEM 6.5 or the cloud release
- After upgrade, verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the affected form fields
- Deploy to production once testing is complete
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46964 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46964 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data