CVE-2025-46966
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The injected payload persists in the system and executes in victim users' browsers when they navigate to pages containing the compromised form fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed AEM versionAccess the AEM Web Console (typically at /system/console/configMgr) or check the version file in the installation directory. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: versions before 6.5.23.0 or before 2025.5.0.Affected if The installed version is less than 6.5.23.0 or less than 2025.5.0.
-
Identify AEM Forms module presenceCheck if AEM Forms is installed by navigating to the Forms section in AEM (typically at /aem/forms) or by reviewing installed packages in the Package Manager.Affected if AEM Forms or form-related packages are installed and active.
-
Verify low-privilege user access to formsReview user group permissions in AEM User Management (accessible at /libs/granite/security/content/useradmin) and check if users with Contributor or lower privileges have access to create or edit form content.Affected if Low-privilege users (Contributor level or below) have permissions to create, edit, or submit form fields.
-
Inspect stored form field content for malicious scriptsUse CRX/DE (accessible at /crx/de) to query form field content nodes under /content or /apps where forms store submitted data. Look for script tags, javascript: URIs, or event handlers in field values.Affected if Form field content nodes contain unsanitized HTML, script tags, or JavaScript event handlers.
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 AND AEM Forms is enabled AND low-privilege users can access form editing, or if malicious script payloads are already present in form field content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Apply the vendor-provided patch (AEM 6.5.23 or later) to address the vulnerability. Additionally, implement input validation and output encoding on form fields as defense-in-depth measures.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 (or later) / 2025.5.0 (or later for Cloud Service)
- Verify current Adobe Experience Manager version by navigating to /system/console/bundles or checking the AEM welcome page
- Review the AEM upgrade documentation for your current version at https://helpx.adobe.com/experience-manager/6-5.html
- Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Back up the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configuration files
- Stop the AEM instance before beginning the upgrade
- Upgrade to Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 or later (or 2025.5.0 or later for Cloud Service)
- Start the upgraded AEM instance and verify all bundles are active
- Test critical workflows and forms to ensure functionality is intact
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46966 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46966 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data