CVE-2025-46983
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form fields. The malicious payload persists in the system and executes when users view pages containing the compromised fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AEM versionAccess the AEM Web Console (Go to /system/console/configMgr and look for 'Adobe Experience Manager Version' in the About Adobe Experience Manager section), or check the version file in the installation directory. Alternatively, request the JSON endpoint at /libs/granite/core/content/login.json or check the welcome page footer.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.5.23.0 or earlier than 2025.5.0 (the version shown is below the patched releases)
-
Confirm Forms or Adaptive Forms module is in useNavigate to the AEM Forms interface at /aem/forms or check if the forms.webservices configuration exists in the OSGi config manager at /system/console/configMgr. Look for packages with 'forms' in the name under /system/console/bundles.Affected if The Forms or Adaptive Forms module is installed and accessible to users
-
Identify exposed form endpointsCheck for accessible form-related URLs in the publish instance, such as /content/forms/af/, /bin/form/..., or custom form paths. Use CRX/DE (accessible at /crx/de) to search for form content nodes under /content/forms/ and verify they are published and accessible.Affected if Form content nodes exist under /content/forms/ and are published to the publish instance
-
Verify form field input validation configurationInspect form field components in CRX/DE under /libs/fd/af/components or custom form component paths. Check whether XSS protection rules are defined in the form field's 'validation' properties or in the overall form submission configuration.Affected if Form fields do not have XSS validation rules configured or the validation can be bypassed by low-privileged users
Your environment is affected if the installed AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 AND Forms/Adaptive Forms are enabled and accessible to users who can submit content to form fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Apply Adobe's official security patch by upgrading AEM to version 6.5.23 or later after validating compatibility in a non-production environment.
AEM 6.5.23.0 or later for 6.5.x line; AEM 2025.5.0 or later for 2025.x line
- 1. Back up your current AEM instance including repository, database, and configuration files
- 2. Review Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 release notes for any migration or compatibility requirements
- 3. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- 4. Run the upgrade following Adobe's standard AEM upgrade procedure for your deployment type
- 5. Verify that the Forms or form-based components function correctly after upgrade
- 6. Validate that no custom code depends on vulnerable behavior that may have changed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46983 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46983 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data