CVE-2025-47013
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier allows a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form fields. The malicious script executes in victims' browsers when they view pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine AEM installed versionNavigate to AEM Welcome page > Help > About, or access /system/console/configMgr and locate the 'Adobe Experience Manager Web Console' entry which displays the version numberAffected if Version is 6.5.22.0 or earlier, OR version is below 2025.5.0 (for AEM as a Cloud Service)
-
Check AEM as a Cloud Service versionAccess the Cloud Manager UI and check the environment details, or run 'aio cloudmanager:list-programs' CLI command to identify the release versionAffected if Release version is below 2025.5.0 for AEM as a Cloud Service instances
-
Identify deployed Adaptive FormsNavigate to Forms > Forms & Documents in AEM Assets console and list all Adaptive Form assets. Check if any forms are published and accessible to low-privileged usersAffected if Adaptive Forms with input fields are deployed and accessible to users outside admin group
-
Review form field XSS protection settingsOpen an Adaptive Form in edit mode, select a text input field, and inspect the Field Properties panel for 'Validation' settings. Check if HTML sanitization or input validation patterns are configuredAffected if Form fields lack input validation patterns or have 'Allow Rich Text' enabled without custom XSS filtering
-
Check custom form component configurationsNavigate to CRX/DE (crx/de.jsp) and examine /apps or /content for custom form component definitions under /libs/foundation/components or custom component pathsAffected if Custom form components are present that use raw HTML output or lack the 'escapeXSS' property set to true
A user is affected if their AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 (for 6.x on-premise) or below 2025.5.0 (for Cloud), AND they have Adaptive Forms or form-based components accessible to low-privileged users without proper XSS protection on input fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to the patched version as specified in the Adobe security bulletin. Additionally, implement input validation and output encoding on form fields to prevent XSS.
AEM 6.5.23.0 (or 2025.5.0 for the 2025.x release line)
- Verify current Adobe Experience Manager version in use (check /system/console or AEM welcome page)
- Review Adobe's official documentation at helpx.adobe.com for the specific upgrade procedure
- Schedule maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Back up the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configurations
- For 6.5.x line: Upgrade to AEM 6.5.23.0 or later
- For 2025.x line: Upgrade to AEM 2025.5.0 or later
- After upgrade, verify the XSS fix is applied by testing form field input sanitization
- Validate that existing workflows and integrations function correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47013 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47013 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data