Experience ManagerApplication · Adobe

CVE-2025-47035

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.5.23.0 / 2025.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The malicious payload persists in the system and executes when users view pages containing the compromised fields.

MitigationApply Adobe Experience Manager update 6.5.23 or later to patch the stored XSS vulnerability; additionally implement output encoding and input validation on custom form components as defense-in-depth.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Experience ManagerApplication
Affected:< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed AEM version
    Access the AEM Welcome page or check the product version via the system console at /system/console/configMgr/org.apache.sling.commons.log.LogManagerFactory.config, or run: curl -s -u admin:password http://localhost:4502/crx/packmgr/service.jsp?cmd=version
    Affected if The version is earlier than 6.5.23.0 or earlier than 2025.5.0 (for cloud/2024 releases)
  2. Locate custom form components
    Search the AEM repository at /apps for custom components containing form fields: run find /apps -name '*.xml' -exec grep -l 'form' {} \; or inspect the CRX/DE at /apps for any custom components that extend core form components
    Affected if Custom form components exist in /apps without proper output encoding validation
  3. Inspect form submission data for malicious payloads
    Query the AEM repository for stored XSS patterns in form data: use the Query Builder API at /bin/querybuilder.json?type=nt:base&property=jcr:content/*&property.value=%3Cscript%3E or search repository nodes containing common XSS vectors like <script, javascript:, onload=, onerror=
    Affected if Form submission nodes contain unsanitized HTML or JavaScript payloads
  4. Review custom component JSP/HTL for output encoding
    Examine custom form component files (HTL, JSP, orSightly templates) in /apps for presence of encoding context: search for ${properties.value} without @context='html' or out.escape() calls, or check if custom components use unencoded output in form field values
    Affected if Custom form components output user-supplied values without proper @context='html' encoding or equivalent escaping

You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 AND you have custom form components that accept user input without output encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.5.23.0 / 2025.5.0 or later
Fixed in 6.5.23.02025.5.0
Interim mitigation

Apply Adobe Experience Manager update 6.5.23 or later to patch the stored XSS vulnerability; additionally implement output encoding and input validation on custom form components as defense-in-depth.

Recommended fix High confidence

Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 or later for the 6.5.x release line; Adobe Experience Manager 2025.5.0 or later for the 2025.x release line

  1. Back up the current AEM instance and all content repositories before proceeding with any upgrade
  2. Review the official Adobe Experience Manager release notes for version 6.5.23.0 (or 2025.5.0 for the 2025.x release line) to understand new features and changes
  3. Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment to verify compatibility with custom code and integrations
  4. Apply the upgrade to production environments after successful testing
  5. Verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved by attempting to inject script content into form fields that were previously vulnerable
Caveat Review release notes for potential breaking changes between current version and target version; custom components or integrations may require updates

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Experience Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47035 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47035 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data