CVE-2025-47061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. A low-privileged attacker can inject malicious JavaScript scripts into vulnerable form inputs, which are then stored and executed in the browsers of users who view the affected page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine AEM versionAccess the AEM System Information console at /system/console/status-html or check the version file in the crx-quickstart folder. Compare the installed version against 6.5.23.0 for 6.x releases or 2025.5 for cloud releases.Affected if Installed version is below 6.5.23.0 for AEM 6.x or below 2025.5 for AEM as a Cloud Service.
-
Identify form field usageReview the AEM content structure under /content or /apps to locate any custom form components, Adaptive Forms, or core form components that accept user input.Affected if Custom or out-of-the-box form components that accept and store user input are present in the environment.
-
Verify input validation on form componentsInspect the server-side code (Java/OSGi services) handling form submissions in /apps or /libs. Check whether form field components implement server-side validation or sanitization before storing data.Affected if Form components lack server-side input validation, sanitization, or output encoding.
-
Examine stored form data for malicious scriptsQuery the JCR repository or examine form submission data in the crx/de console under /content/dam/formsanddocuments or similar data storage paths. Look for script tags, javascript: URLs, or event handlers in stored field values.Affected if Stored form data contains unsanitized HTML, script tags, or JavaScript event handlers.
The environment is affected if running AEM below version 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5 and form fields with user input are present without proper server-side input validation or output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5
Apply the vendor patch when available. In the interim, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers and validate/sanitize all user inputs in form fields server-side before storage and output encoding before rendering.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 or later (6.5.x track); Adobe Experience Manager 2025.5 or later (2025.x track)
- Back up the current Adobe Experience Manager instance, including repository content and configuration files
- Review the Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 (or 2025.5) release notes for any changes relevant to your implementation
- Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment before deploying to production
- Apply the upgrade to AEM following Adobe's official upgrade documentation (typically via the CRX Package Manager or new installation with content migration)
- After upgrade, verify the vulnerability is resolved by attempting to inject script content into the affected form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data