CVE-2025-47158
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAuthentication bypass by assumed-immutable data in Azure DevOps allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Azure DevOps where certain data that was assumed to be immutable can be manipulated, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to elevate privileges to higher access levels over a network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Azure DevOps deployment typeDetermine if your organization uses Azure DevOps Services (cloud) or Azure DevOps Server (on-premises). This matters because patch availability and application differ between deployment types.Affected if Running any version of Azure DevOps Server on-premises or any tenant of Azure DevOps Services.
-
Check currently installed Azure DevOps Server versionOn the Azure DevOps Server application tier machine, open Azure DevOps Administration Console and view the version number displayed on the Server Information tab. For Azure DevOps Services, this information is available in the organization settings under Organization overview.Affected if Any version is installed, since the advisory states all versions are affected.
-
Review Azure DevOps audit logs for authentication anomaliesNavigate to Azure DevOps organization settings, select Audit log, and examine entries around the time window of potential exploitation. Look for successful actions performed in short succession, especially privilege escalation actions like adding users to elevated security groups, modifying project permissions, or accessing resources outside normal patterns.Affected if Audit logs show unauthenticated or unexpected authenticated actions that correlate with privilege escalation activities.
-
Examine security group membership changesIn Azure DevOps organization settings, go to Security and review recent changes to security groups, especially Administrator groups, Project Collection Administrator groups, or any group granting elevated access. Check who added members and whether that activity aligns with expected administrative actions.Affected if Unexpected members added to privileged security groups without legitimate administrative approval.
-
Inspect API and service hook activity logsIn Azure DevOps, review API call logs and service hook delivery history for patterns indicating unauthorized data manipulation, particularly calls that modified user permissions, access control entries, or security settings without proper authentication context.Affected if API calls or service hook executions successfully modified security-relevant data without valid authentication credentials.
A defender is affected if they run any version of Azure DevOps and their audit logs or security configurations show evidence of unauthorized privilege escalation or authentication bypass attempts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Microsoft-provided patches for Azure DevOps when released; review Azure DevOps audit logs for signs of exploitation; implement least-privilege access controls as a defensive measure until patch is available.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,184.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47158 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data