Qam8255p FirmwareOperating system · Qualcomm

CVE-2025-47363

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Memory corruption when calculating oversized partition sizes without proper checks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability occurs when the system calculates partition sizes without proper validation, allowing oversized partition sizes to be processed. This can lead to buffer overflows or improper memory allocation, potentially allowing an attacker to overwrite memory boundaries and execute arbitrary code.

MitigationImplement rigorous input validation and bounds checking on all partition size calculations to ensure values remain within safe limits before memory allocation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Qam8255p FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qam8295p FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qam8620p FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qam8650p FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qam8775p FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qamsrv1h FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qamsrv1m FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Qca6574au FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify firmware version
    Check the system firmware version by querying the bootloader, /proc/version, or device information interface (e.g., 'cat /proc/version', '固件版本' in system settings, or via UART/serial console at boot)
    Affected if The firmware version string matches any of: Qam8255p, Qam8295p, Qam8620p, Qam8650p, Qam8775p, Qamsrv1h, Qamsrv1m, Qca6574au (all versions are affected)
  2. Confirm hardware model
    Check the hardware or board identifier via 'cat /sys/class/hwmon/*/name', 'cat /proc/device-tree/model', or physical board labeling
    Affected if The hardware model corresponds to one of the affected firmware variants listed above
  3. Locate partition service
    Identify if the partition management service is running by checking running processes (ps command) for components named 'qamsrv', 'partition', 'partitionmgr', or check /system/bin or /vendor/bin for relevant binaries
    Affected if A partition management service or binary named qamsrv, partitiond, or similar is present and active on the system
  4. Inspect partition configuration
    Examine partition table definitions in /proc/partition, /etc/fstab, /dev/block/, or device tree overlays (DTB) for any partition entries
    Affected if Partition configuration files exist and the system defines multiple partitions, indicating the vulnerable calculation logic is invoked
  5. Check for partition size anomalies
    Review system logs (dmesg, logcat, /var/log/) for warnings related to partition size, memory allocation failures, or buffer overflow indicators near partition initialization
    Affected if Logs contain errors such as 'partition size too large', 'allocation failed', or memory corruption warnings during boot or partition operations

You are affected if your device runs any of the listed Qualcomm firmware variants (Qam8255p, Qam8295p, Qam8620p, Qam8650p, Qam8775p, Qamsrv1h, Qamsrv1m, Qca6574au) as all versions contain the vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement rigorous input validation and bounds checking on all partition size calculations to ensure values remain within safe limits before memory allocation.

Fix this in Qam8255p Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47363 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47363 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data