CVE-2025-47439
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in WP Chill Download Monitor download-monitor allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Download Monitor: from n/a through <= 5.0.22.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Download Monitor WordPress plugin. The plugin fails to properly validate filenames used in include/require statements, allowing attackers to manipulate file path parameters and potentially execute arbitrary PHP code by including malicious local files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Download Monitor plugin is installedCheck wp-content/plugins/ directory for download-monitor folder, or query WordPress database: SELECT * FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'active_plugins' and option_value LIKE '%download-monitor%';Affected if Plugin folder exists in plugins directory or is listed in active plugins
-
Determine installed plugin versionRead version from download-monitor/readme.txt or download-monitor/plugin.php header, or query: SELECT * FROM wp_options WHERE option_name LIKE '%download_monitor%version%';Affected if Version number cannot be determined or falls within unpatched release range
-
Identify plugin endpoints accepting file parametersReview plugin source files in wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/ for include/require statements using $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST variables without proper sanitizationAffected if Code contains include/require with unsanitized user input parameters
-
Check for known vulnerable parametersSearch plugin PHP files for patterns like 'include($_REQUEST', 'require($_GET', 'include($file', 'require_once($_POST' without basename(), realpath(), or whitelist validationAffected if File inclusion functions use raw user input without validation
-
Review web server access logs for exploitation attemptsGrep access logs (usually in /var/log/apache2/ or /var/log/nginx/) for patterns like: ?file=../../, ?file=/etc/passwd, ?include=, ?path=../../../Affected if Logs contain requests with directory traversal sequences targeting the plugin endpoints
Environment is affected if Download Monitor plugin is active and the version has known LFI vulnerability in file inclusion functionality without proper filename validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Download Monitor plugin to the latest patched version once released. Until then, implement web application firewall rules to block suspicious file inclusion requests and review server logs for signs of exploitation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47439 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47439 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data