Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-47462

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebAppick Challan webappick-pdf-invoice-for-woocommerce allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Challan: from n/a through <= 3.7.58.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebAppick Challan PDF Invoice plugin for WooCommerce allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions that result in privilege escalation. The lack of proper CSRF token validation on sensitive admin actions enables malicious requests to be executed without the user's knowledge.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing admin actions and forms within the plugin, and verify the nonce validation on the server side before processing any privilege-related operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm plugin installation
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and verify the 'WebAppick Challan PDF Invoice for WooCommerce' plugin is installed and active
    Affected if the plugin is installed and active in the WordPress environment
  2. Identify installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin > Plugins, find the WebAppick Challan PDF Invoice plugin and note the installed version number displayed
    Affected if the version number cannot be determined or is earlier than when the fix was applied
  3. Check for CSRF nonce implementation in plugin code
    Access the plugin files via FTP or file manager, then inspect the admin action handlers (typically in files like class-woo-invoice-challan-admin.php or similar) and look for wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer calls before processing privilege-related operations
    Affected if sensitive admin actions (user role changes, settings updates, order manipulations) lack nonce verification before executing
  4. Verify form submissions include nonce fields
    Examine the plugin PHP files that render admin forms and AJAX handlers to confirm that wp_nonce_field or wp_create_nonce is used to generate hidden nonce fields in all state-changing forms
    Affected if admin forms or AJAX endpoints handling sensitive operations do not contain nonce field outputs
  5. Test for CSRF vulnerability via authenticated request simulation
    As an administrator, create a legitimate request (e.g., changing plugin settings or modifying user permissions) while monitoring the HTTP request headers and parameters to verify a valid CSRF token is required and validated server-side
    Affected if the server processes sensitive admin actions without requiring and validating a unique token tied to the user session

A user is affected if the WebAppick Challan PDF Invoice plugin for WooCommerce is installed and its sensitive admin actions lack proper CSRF token validation before processing privilege-related operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing admin actions and forms within the plugin, and verify the nonce validation on the server side before processing any privilege-related operations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47462 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data