CVE-2025-47484
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Oliver Campion Display Remote Posts Block display-remote-posts-block allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Display Remote Posts Block: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the WordPress plugin 'Display Remote Posts Block' (display-remote-posts-block) versions 1.1.0 and below allows unauthenticated attackers to make the server perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources, potentially exposing internal services, cloud metadata, or bypassing network restrictions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the plugin installation directoryCheck your WordPress installation for the presence of wp-content/plugins/display-remote-posts-block/ directoryAffected if The plugin directory exists on the server
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen wp-content/plugins/display-remote-posts-block/display-remote-posts-block.php and locate the Version header in the plugin comment block, or check the readme.txt fileAffected if The reported version is 1.1.0 or lower
-
Confirm the plugin is activeQuery the WordPress database wp_options table for the option name 'active_plugins', or use the WordPress admin dashboard to list active pluginsAffected if The plugin appears in the list of active plugins and the version is 1.1.0 or below
-
Inspect plugin functionality for remote request featuresExamine the plugin PHP files in the plugin directory for functions that accept user-supplied URLs (such as wp_remote_get, file_get_contents with URL parameters, or cURL calls)Affected if The plugin code contains functions that fetch remote content based on user input without proper validation
A user is affected if the Display Remote Posts Block plugin version 1.1.0 or below is installed and active on their WordPress site, as unauthenticated attackers could exploit the SSRF vulnerability through the plugin's remote request functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of the Display Remote Posts Block plugin that includes proper URL validation and allowlist filtering to prevent SSRF attacks. Until patched, restrict the plugin's functionality or monitor server access logs for suspicious request patterns.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47484 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47484 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data