CVE-2025-47527
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Collect icegram-rainmaker allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Icegram Collect: from n/a through <= 1.3.18.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the Icegram Collect (icegram-rainmaker) WordPress plugin allows authenticated users or attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality, enabling unauthorized actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Icegram Collect plugin filesCheck your WordPress installation under wp-content/plugins/ for directories named 'icegram-rainmaker' or 'icegram-collect'. If neither directory exists, the plugin is not installed.Affected if The plugin directory exists on the server.
-
Identify the installed versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually icegram-rainmaker.php or icegram-collect.php) and look for the plugin header comment containing 'Version:' followed by a number. Alternatively, check the readme.txt file for the 'Stable tag' or 'Version' field.Affected if You cannot determine the version, or the version matches the affected range.
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn the WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins and check whether 'Icegram Collect' or 'Icegram Rainmaker' shows as 'Active'. You can also check the wp_options table for the 'active_plugins' option.Affected if The plugin appears in the active plugins list.
-
Confirm authenticated user access existsReview your WordPress user roles and capabilities. Check if any user accounts exist beyond just administrators, particularly roles with 'subscriber', 'contributor', 'author', or editor-level access that could potentially trigger the vulnerable code paths.Affected if Multiple user roles exist or non-admin users have access to the site.
You are likely affected if the Icegram Collect plugin is installed, active, and your version lacks the authorization patch while authenticated users can access the site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Icegram Collect to the latest version to receive the patched release that implements proper authorization checks. If no patch is available, review and restrict access to affected plugin functions based on user roles and capabilities.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47527 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47527 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data