CVE-2025-47536
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in keywordrush Content Egg content-egg allows Object Injection.This issue affects Content Egg: from n/a through <= 7.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Content Egg WordPress plugin through version 7.0.0 is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection via deserialization of untrusted data. This deserialization flaw allows attackers to inject malicious PHP objects, potentially leading to remote code execution depending on available classes in the application or WordPress environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Content Egg plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Content Egg' in the list. Alternatively, check if /wp-content/plugins/content-egg/ directory exists on the server.Affected if Content Egg plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed versionIn WordPress admin_plugins list, the version number is displayed under the plugin name. Alternatively, check the 'readme.txt' or 'content-egg.php' file in the plugin directory for the 'Version' header.Affected if Version is 7.0.0 or lower (any version through 7.0.0)
-
Locate deserialization calls in plugin codeSearch the plugin directory for PHP 'unserialize()' function calls. In command line: grep -r "unserialize" /path/to/wp-content/plugins/content-egg/Affected if The plugin contains unserialize() calls that process input from user-accessible sources
-
Identify input sources reaching deserializationReview the code around any unserialize() calls found. Check if data comes from POST/GET parameters, cookies, or API endpoints without sanitization.Affected if Untrusted user input (request parameters, headers, or external API responses) flows directly into unserialize() without validation
A user is affected if Content Egg plugin version 7.0.0 or lower is installed AND the plugin processes untrusted data through PHP unserialize() in accessible code paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the patched version of Content Egg as soon as available. Until then, disable the plugin or implement strict input validation to prevent untrusted data from reaching deserialization functions.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47536 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47536 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data