CVE-2025-47619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in 6Storage 6Storage Rentals 6storage-rentals allows Path Traversal.This issue affects 6Storage Rentals: from n/a through <= 2.20.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization combined with path traversal vulnerability in 6Storage Rentals application versions up to 2.20.2 allows authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to access files outside the intended web root directory by manipulating file path inputs without proper authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed 6Storage Rentals versionLocate the application's version number in the admin dashboard (typically under Help > About or Settings > System Info), or check the version file in the web root directory (often version.php, or a config file containing a 'version' or 'app_version' key)Affected if The installed version is 2.20.2 or lower (any version up to and including 2.20.2)
-
Verify file upload/download functionality is exposedIdentify endpoints that handle file operations - look for routes containing patterns like '/file/', '/upload/', '/download/', '/attachment/', or '/media/' in your web server logs or application routing configurationAffected if The application exposes any file handling endpoints without requiring elevated permissions
-
Check for authorization on file access endpointsReview the application's access control configuration or source code to determine if file retrieval endpoints validate user permissions before serving files. Check if endpoints can be accessed without authentication or with low-privilege accountsAffected if File access endpoints are accessible to unauthenticated users or allow access to files belonging to other users/tenants without proper authorization checks
-
Inspect path validation on file operationsExamine how the application handles file path inputs - check if the code validates or sanitizes path parameters to prevent directory traversal sequences (such as '../' or '..\') before using them in file operationsAffected if File path parameters are used directly without sanitization or validation to prevent traversal outside the intended directory
A user is affected if the installed 6Storage Rentals version is 2.20.2 or lower AND the application exposes file handling endpoints that lack proper authorization checks and path validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all file access operations and validate/sanitize file path inputs to prevent directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../). Enforce least-privilege access controls and verify user permissions before allowing file operations.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data