CVE-2025-47650
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Infility Infility Global infility-global allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Infility Global: from n/a through <= 2.15.06.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Infility Global allows attackers to access files outside the intended restricted directory through manipulation of file path inputs. The vulnerability exists in versions through 2.15.06 and could allow unauthorized file system access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Infility Global installationLocate the Infility Global application installation directory or running service. Check for binary files, configuration files, or service entries named 'Infility' or 'Global' in standard application directories (e.g., /opt, /usr/local, Program Files, or application-specific paths).Affected if Infility Global software is present on the system
-
Identify installed versionLocate the version file, about dialog, or executable that displays version information. Common locations include: a VERSION file in the installation root, the main executable's properties, a config file with version metadata, or the application's startup logs.Affected if The installed version is 2.15.06 or any earlier version (versions through 2.15.06 are affected)
-
Check for file path parameter functionalityIdentify if the application exposes any features that accept file path inputs, such as file upload, file import, file download, export, or attachment handling endpoints. Review application menus, API endpoints, or web interface for these features.Affected if File path input features are accessible (the path traversal flaw applies to these features)
-
Review file handling configurationInspect configuration files in the installation directory for settings related to file access, upload directories, allowed paths, or path validation. Look for config files like config.xml, settings.conf, or similar.Affected if File handling is enabled and paths are not strictly validated to a restricted directory
The environment is affected if Infility Global is installed with version 2.15.06 or lower and the application exposes file path input functionality that lacks proper path validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization for all file path parameters, ensuring paths are constrained to allowed directories using canonicalization checks and proper access controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47650 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data