CVE-2025-47651
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Infility Infility Global infility-global allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Infility Global: from n/a through <= 2.15.06.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in Infility Global application allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input. The flaw exists in versions up to and including 2.15.06, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or modification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Infility Global versionLocate the application version information, typically found in the application header, an about page, a configuration file, or the software manifest. Common locations include version files, changelogs, or the administrative interface.Affected if The installed version is 2.15.06 or earlier (any version up to and including 2.15.06 is affected)
-
Identify SQL query entry pointsReview application source code or configuration to locate all locations where user-supplied input is incorporated into SQL queries. Focus on search fields, login forms, filtering options, URL parameters, and API endpoints.Affected if Dynamic SQL queries exist that directly incorporate user input without sanitization or parameterization
-
Inspect the input validation mechanismExamine how the application handles user input before passing it to database queries. Check for presence of input validation functions, whitelist approaches, or sanitization routines in the code paths leading to SQL execution.Affected if No input validation, sanitization, or parameterized queries are implemented for the identified entry points
-
Test for SQL injection susceptibilityIf authorized and in a test environment, submit SQL metacharacters (such as single quotes, UNION statements, or boolean-based payloads) to identified input fields and observe database error responses or unexpected behavior.Affected if The application returns database errors, displays unexpected data, or behaves inconsistently when SQL metacharacters are submitted
You are affected if the Infility Global application version is 2.15.06 or earlier and dynamic SQL queries incorporate user input without parameterized statements or input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements, implement strict input validation, and apply least-privilege database accounts to limit impact.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47651 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47651 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data