CVE-2025-47663
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in mojoomla Hospital Management System allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server. This issue affects Hospital Management System: from 47.0(20 through 11.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe mojoomla Hospital Management System contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability that allows attackers to upload dangerous file types, specifically web shells, directly to the web server. This enables remote code execution and complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify mojolema Hospital Management System installationSearch the web server for files or directories containing 'mojolema' or 'hospital' in the path, or check known installation directories for the applicationAffected if The application is installed and no patched version is confirmed
-
Determine the installed versionCheck version files, README files, or admin panels within the mojolema application for version informationAffected if The version cannot be verified or falls within affected version ranges (if known)
-
Locate file upload functionalitySearch the application for file upload forms, endpoints, or API paths (common paths include /upload, /file-upload, /documents/upload, or similar)Affected if File upload features are present in the application
-
Inspect upload endpoint configurationExamine the upload handler script or controller code for file type validation logic - look for allowlist vs blocklist approaches and whether extensions are properly validatedAffected if The upload code lacks strict allowlist-based file type validation or can be bypassed
-
Check upload directory placementVerify where uploaded files are stored relative to the webroot - examine the upload path configuration in the application codeAffected if Uploads are stored within the webroot and retain executable file extensions (.php, .phtml, .php5, .exe, .sh, etc.)
If mojolema Hospital Management System is running with accessible file upload functionality that lacks strict allowlist validation or stores uploads within the webroot with executable extensions, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based file type validation, restrict upload directories outside webroot, rename uploaded files, and disable script execution permissions on upload directories.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47663 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data