SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-47671

HIGH · 7.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in LETSCMS MLM Software Binary MLM Plan binary-mlm-plan allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Binary MLM Plan: from n/a through <= 3.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in LETSCMS MLM Software's Binary MLM Plan component allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input fields. The vulnerability affects all versions up to 3.0 and can be exploited remotely without authentication based on the CVSS score.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL query construction with parameterized queries/prepared statements across all user input handling in the Binary MLM Plan module, and implement input validation and output encoding as defense-in-depth.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify LETSCMS MLM Software installation
    Locate the LETSCMS installation directory on your server. Look for directories containing MLM-related code, typically named 'letscms', 'mlm', or similar within your web root.
    Affected if LETSCMS MLM Software is installed on the server
  2. Check installed LETSCMS version
    Locate the version file or configuration file within the LETSCMS installation. Common locations include a 'version.php', 'config.php', or a 'README' file in the root directory. Compare the version number to the affected range (all versions up to and including 3.0).
    Affected if The installed version is 3.0 or lower
  3. Verify Binary MLM Plan module presence
    Check for the Binary MLM Plan component in the LETSCMS installation. Look for directories or files named 'binary', 'binary_mlm', 'mlm_plan', or similar within the modules or plans subdirectory.
    Affected if The Binary MLM Plan module is present and enabled
  4. Inspect user input handling in Binary MLM module
    Examine the PHP files within the Binary MLM Plan module for dynamic SQL query construction. Search for SQL queries built by concatenating user-supplied input directly into query strings, without using prepared statements or parameter binding.
    Affected if Dynamic SQL queries exist that incorporate user input without proper parameterization or sanitization
  5. Check for unsanitized input parameters
    Review form handlers and API endpoints in the Binary MLM Plan module for user input fields (such as registration forms, upline ID fields, position parameters, or package selection inputs). Verify whether these inputs are validated or sanitized before being used in database queries.
    Affected if User input fields are processed without sanitization or validation before being used in SQL queries

You are affected if LETSCMS MLM Software with a Binary MLM Plan module is running and the installed version is 3.0 or lower with dynamic SQL queries handling user input without parameterized queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL query construction with parameterized queries/prepared statements across all user input handling in the Binary MLM Plan module, and implement input validation and output encoding as defense-in-depth.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47671 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47671 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data