Wivia 5 FirmwareOperating system · Uchida

CVE-2025-47697

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Client-side enforcement of server-side security issue exists in wivia 5 all versions. If exploited, an unauthenticated attacker may bypass authentication and operate the affected device as the moderator user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an authentication bypass vulnerability in wivia 5 where client-side enforcement of server-side security allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication and operate the device with moderator privileges. The vulnerability stems from the application trusting client-side security controls or tokens instead of properly validating them server-side.

MitigationApply any available vendor patch for wivia 5 that addresses client-side security enforcement. If no patch exists, implement server-side authentication validation and disable client-side trust mechanisms.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wivia 5 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Wivia 5 installation
    Identify if the system is running Uchida Wivia 5 by checking the firmware version, application logs, or network service banners. Look for 'wivia' or 'Wivia 5' in running processes, installed packages, or device information.
    Affected if The system is running any version of Uchida Wivia 5 firmware.
  2. Identify authentication mechanism
    Examine the web application or API configuration files for Wivia 5. Look for authentication-related settings, particularly any configuration that specifies 'client-side', 'client enforce', or token-based session management where tokens originate from the client.
    Affected if The application uses client-side security controls, tokens, or session identifiers that are not validated server-side.
  3. Check moderator privilege configuration
    Review the user privilege configuration or role-based access control (RBAC) settings in Wivia 5. Identify how moderator privileges are defined and whether client-supplied parameters determine privilege levels.
    Affected if Moderator privileges can be assigned or escalated through client-supplied parameters without server-side verification.
  4. Test unauthenticated moderator access
    Send an HTTP request to Wivia 5 endpoints with a crafted request claiming moderator privileges, but without completing server-side authentication. Observe if the application accepts client-side claims for moderator access.
    Affected if The application grants moderator-level access based on client-side claims without proper server-side authentication validation.

A user is affected if the system runs Uchida Wivia 5 and the application trusts client-side security controls or tokens for authentication and privilege assignment instead of validating them server-side.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply any available vendor patch for wivia 5 that addresses client-side security enforcement. If no patch exists, implement server-side authentication validation and disable client-side trust mechanisms.

Fix this in Wivia 5 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47697 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47697 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data