CVE-2025-47752
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedV-SFT v6.2.5.0 and earlier contains an issue with out-of-bounds write in VS6ComFile!MakeItemGlidZahyou function. Opening specially crafted V7 or V8 files may lead to crash, information disclosure, and arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceV-SFT v6.2.5.0 and earlier contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the VS6ComFile!MakeItemGlidZahyou function when parsing specially crafted V7 or V8 files. This memory corruption vulnerability can be triggered when a user opens a malicious file, potentially leading to application crash, information disclosure, or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.1.0, < 6.2.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Monitouch V Sft is installedCheck the system for V-SFT installation by looking in Program Files for Fujielectric Monitouch V-Sft folder, or check Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named Monitouch V Sft or similar Fujielectric productAffected if V-SFT is not found on the system, this CVE does not apply
-
Determine the installed V-SFT versionLocate the main V-SFT executable (typically named V-SFT.exe or similar) and view its file properties to find the Product Version, or check the registry Uninstall entry for the Version valueAffected if The version cannot be determined or the product is not installed
-
Compare version against affected rangeParse the version number found (format is X.X.X.X) and check if it falls within >= 6.0.1.0 and < 6.2.6.0. Any version from 6.0.1.0 through 6.2.5.0 is affectedAffected if Installed version is 6.0.1.0, 6.2.0.0, 6.2.5.0 or any version between 6.0.1.0 and 6.2.5.0 inclusive
-
Verify VS6ComFile component presenceSearch for VS6ComFile.dll or VS6ComFile.sys in the V-SFT installation directory, as this module contains the vulnerable MakeItemGlidZahyou functionAffected if The VS6ComFile component exists in the installation folder, indicating the vulnerable code is present
-
Confirm file association with V7/V8 filesCheck if the system has file associations for .v7 or .v8 file extensions linked to V-SFT, or check if users commonly import these file types into the applicationAffected if V-SFT processes or imports V7/V8 files, as this is the attack vector required to trigger the vulnerability
The environment is affected if Monitouch V Sft is installed with version 6.0.1.0 through 6.2.5.0 and the system handles V7 or V8 files, allowing the out-of-bounds write in VS6ComFile!MakeItemGlidZahyou to be triggered.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.6.0
Users should avoid opening untrusted V7 or V8 files until the vendor releases a patch that adds proper bounds checking in the MakeItemGlidZahyou function. Implementing input validation and sandboxing around file parsing operations can provide additional defense-in-depth protection.
6.2.6.0 or later
- Identify the current version of Monitouch V Sft (V-SFT) installed on the system.
- Navigate to the official vendor website (monitouch.fujielectric.com) or a trusted distribution channel to obtain version 6.2.6.0 or later.
- Backup all existing V7/V8 project files and configuration data.
- Install the new version (6.2.6.0 or later) following the vendor's installation instructions.
- After installation, verify that the installed version is 6.2.6.0 or higher.
- Open existing projects to confirm they load correctly and the vulnerability is mitigated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47752 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47752 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data