Monitouch V SftApplication · Fujielectric

CVE-2025-47759

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.2.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
V-SFT v6.2.5.0 and earlier contains an issue with stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CV7BaseMap::WriteV7DataToRom function. Opening specially crafted V7 or V8 files may lead to crash, information disclosure, and arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

V-SFT v6.2.5.0 and earlier contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the VS6ComFile!CV7BaseMap::WriteV7DataToRom function. The vulnerability is triggered when processing specially crafted V7 or V8 files, which can overwrite stack memory and lead to crash, information disclosure, or arbitrary code execution.

MitigationAvoid opening untrusted or unverified V7 or V8 files in V-SFT until an official vendor patch is available. Monitor vendor security advisories for updates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Monitouch V SftApplication
Affected:>= 6.0.1.0, < 6.2.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate V-SFT installation and determine version
    Check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for Monitouch V-SFT or look for the application in Program Files. Right-click the executable (typically named V-SFT.exe or similar) and select Properties > Details to view the File Version.
    Affected if The installed version is 6.0.1.0 or higher but lower than 6.2.6.0
  2. Verify the affected component VS6ComFile exists
    Search for VS6ComFile.dll in the V-SFT installation directory, typically found in the application folder or a subfolder like bin or system.
    Affected if The VS6ComFile.dll file exists in the V-SFT installation directory, confirming the vulnerable component is present
  3. Check for presence of V7 or V8 project files
    Search the system for files with .v7 or .v8 extensions, or look in recent V-SFT project directories for these file types.
    Affected if V7 or V8 project files exist on the system and were likely opened with V-SFT
  4. Review application logs or recent file access
    Check V-SFT application logs, Windows Event Viewer Application logs, or the application's recent files list for entries involving V7 or V8 file processing.
    Affected if Recent activity shows V7 or V8 files were opened or processed in V-SFT

You are affected if V-SFT version is 6.0.1.0 or higher but below 6.2.6.0 AND the VS6ComFile component is present AND V7/V8 files have been processed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.2.6.0 or later
Fixed in 6.2.6.0
Interim mitigation

Avoid opening untrusted or unverified V7 or V8 files in V-SFT until an official vendor patch is available. Monitor vendor security advisories for updates.

Recommended fix High confidence

Monitouch V Sft version 6.2.6.0 or later

  1. Identify the current version of Monitouch V Sft installed in your environment
  2. If the version is >= 6.0.1.0 and < 6.2.6.0, the installation is vulnerable to CVE-2025-47759
  3. Obtain Monitouch V Sft version 6.2.6.0 or later from the official Fujielectric Monitouch vendor (monitouch.fujielectric.com)
  4. Follow the vendor's documented upgrade procedure to apply the update
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking that the installed version is 6.2.6.0 or later
  6. Avoid opening untrusted V7 or V8 files until the patch is applied

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Monitouch V Sft Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47759 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47759 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data