CVE-2025-47997
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in SQL Server where concurrent execution of operations on shared resources lacks proper synchronization. This improper synchronization allows an authorized attacker to potentially disclose information by exploiting the timing window between operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.0.6300.2, < 13.0.6470.1>= 13.0.7000.253, < 13.0.7065.1>= 14.0.1000.169, < 14.0.2085.1>= 14.0.3006.16, < 14.0.3505.1>= 15.0.2000.5, < 15.0.2145.1>= 15.0.4003.23, < 15.0.4445.1>= 16.0.1000.6, < 16.0.1150.1>= 16.0.4003.1, < 16.0.4212.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine SQL Server versionRun query: SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductVersion') AS BuildNumber, SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel') AS ServicePack, SERVERPROPERTY('Edition') AS Edition;Affected if The build number falls within any of these ranges: 13.0.6300.2 to 13.0.6470.1, 13.0.7000.253 to 13.0.7065.1, 14.0.1000.169 to 14.0.2085.1, 14.0.3006.16 to 14.0.3505.1, 15.0.2000.5 to 15.0.2145.1, 15.0.4003.23 to 15.0.4445.1, 16.0.1000.6 to 16.0.1150.1, or 16.0.4003.1 to 16.0.4212.1
-
Confirm major versionRun query: SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductMajorVersion'); This returns 2016, 2017, 2019, or 2022 corresponding to the SQL Server generation.Affected if The major version returned is 2016, 2017, 2019, or 2022 and the build number matches the affected ranges in step 1
-
Identify timing-sensitive workloadsReview application code and SQL jobs that perform concurrent read/write operations on shared database objects such as shared tables, shared indexes, or global temporary objects.Affected if The environment runs custom code or third-party applications that perform concurrent operations on shared resources without explicit locking hints (like WITH NOLOCK, rowlock, or explicit BEGIN TRANSACTION)
Your SQL Server instance is affected if its build number falls within any of the listed vulnerable version ranges AND the instance runs concurrent operations on shared resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped13.0.6470.113.0.7065.114.0.2085.1
Apply the Microsoft security update for SQL Server when released. Review and implement proper locking mechanisms in custom code that accesses shared resources in SQL Server.
SQL Server 2016 to 13.0.7065.1 or later; SQL Server 2017 to 14.0.3505.1 or later; SQL Server 2019 to 15.0.4445.1 or later; SQL Server 2022 to 16.0.4212.1 or later
- Identify your current SQL Server version by running 'SELECT @@VERSION' in SQL Server Management Studio
- Determine which version branch you are on (2016, 2017, 2019, or 2022) and note your current build number
- For SQL Server 2016: Upgrade to build 13.0.7065.1 or later (if on Service Pack 2 branch) or 13.0.6470.1 or later (if on Service Pack 3 branch)
- For SQL Server 2017: Upgrade to build 14.0.3505.1 or later (if on CU30+ branch) or 14.0.2085.1 or later (if on earlier CU branch)
- For SQL Server 2019: Upgrade to build 15.0.4445.1 or later (if on recent branch) or 15.0.2145.1 or later (if on earlier branch)
- For SQL Server 2022: Upgrade to build 16.0.4212.1 or later (if on recent branch) or 16.0.1150.1 or later (if on earlier branch)
- Download and apply the appropriate Cumulative Update (CU) or Service Pack from the Microsoft SQL Server Release Services blog or Microsoft Update Catalog
- Test the update in a non-production environment before applying to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47997 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data