CVE-2025-48001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTime-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Windows BitLocker allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature with a physical attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition exists in Windows BitLocker that can be exploited by an attacker with physical access. The vulnerability allows bypassing a security feature through a race condition between the time the system checks security state and when that state is actually enforced.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21073< 10.0.14393.8246< 10.0.17763.7558< 10.0.19044.6093< 10.0.19045.6093< 10.0.22621.5624< 10.0.22631.5624< 10.0.26100.4652CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to display the Windows build numberAffected if The build number is lower than the fixed version for your Windows release (10.0.10240.21073 for 1507, 10.0.14393.8246 for 1607, 10.0.17763.7558 for 1809, 10.0.19044.6093 for 21h2, 10.0.19045.6093 for 22h2, 10.0.22621.5624 for Win11 22h2, 10.0.22631.5624 for Win11 23h2, or 10.0.26100.4652 for Win11 2
-
Confirm Windows 10/11 release branchRun 'winver' to identify if you are on Windows 10 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2 or Windows 11 22h2, 23h2, 24h2Affected if Running any of the specific releases listed in the affected versions
-
Verify BitLocker is enabledOpen PowerShell and run 'Get-BitLockerVolume -MountPoint C:' or run 'manage-bde -status C:' in Command PromptAffected if BitLocker protection is shown as 'On' or 'Encryption in Progress' - the vulnerability only affects systems where BitLocker is configured
You are affected if your Windows build is lower than the fixed version for your specific Windows release AND BitLocker is enabled on the system, as the race condition only applies to BitLocker-protected volumes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2107310.0.14393.824610.0.17763.7558
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows when available. In the interim, enforce strict physical security controls on endpoints and ensure TPM-protected BitLocker with secure boot configurations are properly enabled.
Latest Windows Security Update for your specific Windows version (install cumulative updates KB5012345 or later as applicable to your version)
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or checking System Properties
- Determine which Windows 10 or 11 version branch is in use (e.g., 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, or Windows 11 22h2/23h2/24h2)
- Apply the latest Windows Security Updates from Windows Update, or manually download and install the specific cumulative update for your version that includes the fix for CVE-2025-48001
- Verify the update was installed successfully by checking Windows Update history
- Confirm the OS version now meets or exceeds the minimum fixed version: Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.21073, Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8246, Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.7558, Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6093, Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6093, Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.5624, Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.5624, Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.4652
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data