CVE-2025-48100
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in extremeidea bidorbuy Store Integrator bidorbuystoreintegrator allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects bidorbuy Store Integrator: from n/a through <= 2.12.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA code injection vulnerability in the bidorbuy Store Integrator plugin allows remote code inclusion due to improper control of code generation. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation that enables attackers to inject malicious code that gets executed server-side.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if bidorbuy Store Integrator plugin is installedCheck your WordPress or e-commerce platform plugin directory for the bidorbuy Store Integrator plugin. Look for files or folders named 'bidorbuy', 'store-integrator', or similar.Affected if The plugin is present in the installation
-
Determine installed plugin versionLocate the plugin version information in the plugin header comment, a version file, or the plugin admin interface. Common locations include a 'readme.txt' file, 'plugin.php' header, or the plugins admin page.Affected if The installed version is 2.12.0 or earlier
-
Inspect code inclusion functionalitySearch the plugin files for dynamic code execution functions such as include, require, eval, create_function, or similar functions that load or execute code at runtime. Examine files that handle user-supplied parameters in these operations.Affected if Dynamic code inclusion functions are present and process user input without sanitization
-
Review input validation on code-related parametersExamine the plugin source code for parameter handling routines, particularly those passed through GET/POST requests that influence code paths. Check if there are whitelist validations or sanitization functions applied before code execution.Affected if User-supplied parameters directly influence code inclusion without proper validation
-
Check for unpatched input handling patternsSearch for patterns where variables containing user input are used directly in include(), require(), or eval() statements without passing through sanitization functions like sanitize_text_field, esc_attr, or custom validation routines.Affected if User input flows directly to code execution functions without validation
You are affected if the bidorbuy Store Integrator plugin is installed and the installed version is 2.12.0 or earlier, or if dynamic code inclusion with unsanitized user input is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a version beyond 2.12.0 that includes proper input sanitization and validates all code inclusion paths. If no patched version exists, implement strict input validation and whitelist-based filtering on all user-supplied parameters used in dynamic code operations.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48100 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48100 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data