CVE-2025-48139
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in relentlo StyleAI relentlosoftware allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects StyleAI: from n/a through <= 1.0.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in StyleAI allows authenticated users to access functionality that should be constrained by access control lists (ACLs). This enables privilege escalation or unauthorized access to sensitive features without proper permission checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate StyleAI installation and versionIdentify where StyleAI is installed (check common web application directories, package installations, or container images). Retrieve the installed version using package manager commands (e.g., pip show styleai, docker images, or checking VERSION/build files in the application root).Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or falls within an unpatched version range.
-
Identify sensitive endpoints and ACL-protected functionsReview application routing, API definitions, or codebase for endpoints marked as admin-only, privileged, or otherwise access-controlled. Common locations: route definitions, middleware configuration, permission decorators, or ACL configuration files.Affected if Sensitive endpoints exist but lack visible authorization checks (missing @require_permission, @admin_required decorators, or middleware enforcement).
-
Test authorization enforcement on protected resourcesUsing an authenticated but low-privilege user account, attempt to access suspected privileged endpoints or functions. Compare expected behavior against actual responses. Check HTTP status codes and whether sensitive data is returned.Affected if Low-privilege authenticated users can access resources or perform actions reserved for higher-privilege roles.
-
Inspect access control configurationExamine ACL configuration files, role definitions, or permission matrices in the application. Look for gaps where sensitive features lack role or permission restrictions.Affected if ACL configuration exists but does not cover all sensitive functions, or allows authenticated users broader access than intended.
-
Verify permission validation in codeReview source code for sensitive functions to confirm authorization checks are present and correctly implemented before executing privileged operations.Affected if Sensitive functions execute without calling authorization validation routines, or checks can be bypassed.
A user is affected if StyleAI is running and authenticated users can access functionality that should be restricted by access controls, enabling privilege escalation or unauthorized access to sensitive features.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, ensuring ACLs are enforced consistently across the application. Verify that all functionality properly validates user permissions before allowing access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48139 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data