CVE-2025-48141
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Alex Zaytseff Multi CryptoCurrency Payments multi-crypto-currency-payment allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Multi CryptoCurrency Payments: from n/a through <= 2.0.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Alex Zaytseff's Multi CryptoCurrency Payments plugin (versions <= 2.0.7) allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input, potentially enabling complete database compromise including theft of payment data, user credentials, and administrative access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed plugin versionNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins > Multi CryptoCurrency Payments. Locate the version number displayed beneath the plugin name.Affected if The displayed version number is 2.0.7 or lower.
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn the WordPress Plugins admin page, confirm the Multi CryptoCurrency Payments plugin shows as 'Active'.Affected if The plugin is active and the version is vulnerable.
-
Identify SQL injection entry pointsInspect plugin source files (typically in wp-content/plugins/multi-cryptocurrency-payments/) for PHP files handling user-supplied parameters. Look for direct insertion of $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST values into SQL queries without proper sanitization (prepare() statements, parameterized queries).Affected if User input parameters are used in SQL queries without prepared statements or escaping functions.
-
Review web server and application logsExamine web server access logs (Apache/nginx) and any available application logs for suspicious SQL syntax patterns (e.g., UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, -- comments) in URLs or POST data targeting cryptocurrency payment endpoints.Affected if Logs contain SQL injection payloads directed at the plugin's endpoints.
-
Check database for unauthorized changesQuery database tables (particularly wp_options, wp_users, and any payment-related custom tables) for unexpected administrative accounts, modified records, or unfamiliar data that may indicate prior exploitation.Affected if Unrecognized admin accounts or suspicious records exist in the database.
A user is affected if the Multi CryptoCurrency Payments plugin version is 2.0.7 or lower and the plugin is active, with unsanitized user input paths present in the code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the latest patched version of the plugin immediately. If no patch is available, disable the plugin, implement WAF rules as a temporary measure, and conduct a full forensic audit for signs of prior compromise.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48141 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48141 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data