CVE-2025-4820
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImpact Cloudflare quiche was discovered to be vulnerable to incorrect congestion window growth, which could cause it to send data at a rate faster than the path might actually support. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the vulnerability by first completing a handshake and initiating a congestion-controlled data transfer towards itself. Then, it could manipulate the victim's congestion control state by sending ACK frames exercising an opportunistic ACK attack; see RFC 9000 Section 21.4. The victim could grow the congestion window beyond typical expectations and allow more bytes in flight than the path might really support. Patches quiche 0.24.4 is the earliest version containing the fix for this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCloudflare quiche contains a congestion control vulnerability where incorrect window growth allows an authenticated attacker (after completing a handshake) to manipulate the victim's congestion control state via ACK frames in an opportunistic ACK attack (RFC 9000 Section 21.4). This causes the victim to grow its congestion window beyond normal expectations and send data at rates the network path cannot support, potentially leading to packet loss, latency spikes, or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.24.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate quiche library in your environmentSearch for quiche library files or check your application's dependency manifest (e.g., Cargo.lock for Rust projects, package.json for Node.js, or library search commands like 'find / -name "*quiche*"' or 'ldconfig -p | grep quiche')Affected if quiche library is present in your environment
-
Identify installed quiche versionRun version check command appropriate to your environment: for Rust projects check Cargo.lock for quiche version, for system libraries use 'pkg-config --modversion quiche' or check library file metadataAffected if version cannot be determined or is lower than 0.24.4
-
Compare your version against the affected rangeVerify the installed quiche version number against the affected range: any version below 0.24.4 is vulnerableAffected if installed version is less than 0.24.4
-
Confirm QUIC connections are being handledReview application logs, configuration, or network captures to confirm the application uses quiche for QUIC protocol handling (vulnerability only applies when quiche processes QUIC traffic)Affected if application processes QUIC connections using quiche and version is below 0.24.4
You are affected if your environment uses Cloudflare quiche library version below 0.24.4 for processing QUIC connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.24.4
Upgrade quiche to version 0.24.4 or later to obtain the fix for the incorrect congestion window growth.
quiche 0.24.4 or later
- Identify the current version of quiche in use by checking project dependencies or cargo/Cargo.toml
- Upgrade quiche to version 0.24.4 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
- Test the application to ensure the QUIC connection functionality remains intact after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4820 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4820 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data