Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-48233

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in affmngr Affiliates Manager Google reCAPTCHA Integration affiliates-manager-google-recaptcha-integration allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Affiliates Manager Google reCAPTCHA Integration: from n/a through <= 1.0.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CSRF vulnerability in the Affiliates Manager Google reCAPTCHA Integration plugin (versions <= 1.0.6) allows authenticated attackers to inject Stored XSS by tricking administrators into submitting malicious requests. The attack chain uses CSRF to bypass authentication and store malicious scripts that execute when other users view the affected admin interface areas.

MitigationApply vendor patch when available. Until then, disable the plugin or restrict admin access, implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all admin forms, and ensure all stored data is properly sanitized before output.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify plugin installation and version
    Access WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins section, locate 'Affiliates Manager Google reCAPTCHA Integration', and record the installed version number. Alternatively, inspect the plugin main file header for the Version field.
    Affected if The plugin is installed with version 1.0.6 or lower.
  2. Confirm admin form CSRF protection exists
    Examine the plugin source code for WordPress nonce verification functions such as wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce, or check_admin_referer on all admin-facing form submissions and URL parameters.
    Affected if No nonce verification is found on admin forms that handle reCAPTCHA settings or other stored configuration data.
  3. Inspect stored data output sanitization
    Review plugin code where stored data is retrieved and displayed in admin interface areas. Look for sanitization functions like esc_html, esc_attr, or sanitize_text_field when outputting stored values.
    Affected if Stored plugin configuration or user-supplied data is output in admin areas without proper sanitization.
  4. Identify affected admin interface areas
    Determine which admin pages or settings panels use the Google reCAPTCHA integration feature. These are the areas where malicious scripts could be stored and later executed.
    Affected if The plugin provides admin pages where reCAPTCHA settings or related data can be saved and viewed by other administrators.

If the plugin is installed with version 1.0.6 or lower and admin forms lack CSRF nonce protection, the environment is vulnerable to stored XSS via CSRF.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch when available. Until then, disable the plugin or restrict admin access, implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all admin forms, and ensure all stored data is properly sanitized before output.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48233 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data