CVE-2025-48283
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Majestic Support Majestic Support majestic-support allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Majestic Support: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in Majestic Support allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user inputs. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements in SQL queries, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or data manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Majestic Support versionLocate the version file or About page within the Majestic Support installation directory, or run the command to display the installed version (e.g., php artisan --version or check version.php in the application root)Affected if The installed version is any version prior to the vendor patch release date for CVE-2025-48283 and the application processes user-supplied input through database queries
-
Locate SQL query handlersSearch the application source code for dynamic SQL query construction patterns, particularly files in the models, database, or query builder directories that handle user-controlled parametersAffected if The codebase contains SQL queries that incorporate request parameters, form inputs, or URL variables directly without parameterized binding
-
Inspect input validationExamine the controller or service files that process user requests, specifically looking for $_GET, $_POST, or request object methods that feed into database operationsAffected if User input fields (search parameters, filters, IDs, or form data) are passed to SQL queries without using prepared statements, binding variables, or sanitization functions
-
Check database interaction modulesReview the database configuration and query execution files for the presence of raw SQL execution methods (e.g., query(), select(), where() with raw input concatenation)Affected if The application uses raw SQL execution or string concatenation to build queries involving any user-accessible input parameters
A user is affected if Majestic Support is installed and the application constructs SQL queries using unsanitized user input without parameterized statements or input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemediate by converting all dynamic SQL queries to parameterized statements/prepared queries and implementing proper input validation. Conduct thorough testing to verify the fix prevents SQL injection across all user-controlled input points.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48283 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data