Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-48306

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in developers savyour Savyour Affiliate Partner savyour-affiliate-partner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Savyour Affiliate Partner: from n/a through <= 2.1.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CSRF vulnerability in the Savyour Affiliate Partner WordPress plugin (versions <= 2.1.4) allows attackers to craft malicious requests that result in Stored XSS. Attackers can exploit the lack of CSRF token validation to trick authenticated administrators into submitting forms that inject malicious scripts into the affected application.

MitigationUpdate to the latest patched version of the Savyour Affiliate Partner plugin. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and ensure proper input sanitization and output encoding to prevent XSS.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Savyour Affiliate Partner plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Savyour Affiliate Partner' or check the plugins directory for /wp-content/plugins/savyour-affiliate-partner/
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, find Savyour Affiliate Partner, and note the version number displayed. Alternatively, check /wp-content/plugins/savyour-affiliate-partner/readme.txt for the Version: field
    Affected if Version is 2.1.4 or lower, or if the version cannot be determined (plugin may be outdated)
  3. Identify forms that handle state-changing actions
    Review the plugin settings pages in WP admin where administrators can submit or modify data. Look for forms that save affiliate settings, partner configurations, or similar input fields
    Affected if The plugin has administrator-accessible forms that accept user input and store it in the database
  4. Inspect form submissions for CSRF protection
    View the page source of plugin admin forms. Check if each form includes a nonce field or anti-CSRF token. In the plugin source files (PHP), locate form handling code and verify if wp_nonce_field() or check_admin_referer() is used before processing form data
    Affected if Forms lack CSRF token validation (no nonce field present in HTML and no nonce verification in PHP handler)
  5. Check stored data for malicious scripts
    In WordPress database (wp_posts, wp_options, or plugin-specific tables), query for any saved affiliate/partner data containing script tags, iframe tags, or javascript: URIs. Use: SELECT * FROM wp_options WHERE option_value LIKE '%<script%'
    Affected if Stored XSS payloads exist in plugin-related database entries

You are affected if the Savyour Affiliate Partner plugin is installed at version 2.1.4 or lower and its admin forms lack CSRF token validation, allowing potential stored XSS injection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to the latest patched version of the Savyour Affiliate Partner plugin. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and ensure proper input sanitization and output encoding to prevent XSS.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,290
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48306 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data