CVE-2025-48309
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in web-able BetPress betpress allows Stored XSS.This issue affects BetPress: from n/a through <= 1.0.1 Lite.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BetPress plugin version <= 1.0.1 Lite allows attackers to craft malicious requests that inject and store XSS payloads. When a victim (typically an administrator) triggers the CSRF request, the malicious script is stored in the application database and executes when other users view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BetPress plugin versionLocate the BetPress plugin in your WordPress installation (typically in wp-content/plugins/) and check the main plugin file (often named main.php, index.php, or betpress.php) for the version declaration in the plugin header commentAffected if The reported version is 1.0.1 or lower
-
Confirm plugin is activeVerify the BetPress Lite plugin is enabled in your WordPress admin panel under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if The plugin is active and running version 1.0.1 or lower
-
Identify state-changing formsExamine plugin PHP files for forms that modify data (submissions, settings updates, content creation) and check if they include WordPress nonce verification using wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_refererAffected if Forms that modify data lack nonce verification and the plugin version is <=1.0.1
-
Inspect stored data for XSS payloadsQuery the WordPress database tables used by BetPress (check plugin documentation for table names) and inspect stored content fields for suspicious script tags, javascript: URIs, or event handler attributesAffected if Stored data contains unsanitized HTML or script tags indicating prior exploitation
-
Review AJAX actions for nonce protectionCheck plugin AJAX handlers (admin-ajax.php calls) for proper nonce verification using check_ajax_referer or wp_verify_nonce before processing requestsAffected if AJAX actions process requests without verifying nonces and plugin version is <=1.0.1
You are affected if BetPress Lite plugin version 1.0.1 or lower is active and any state-changing forms or AJAX actions lack anti-CSRF nonce verification, or if malicious scripts are found stored in the database.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing forms and AJAX actions, combined with proper input sanitization and output encoding to prevent stored XSS injection via CSRF.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48309 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data