CVE-2025-48362
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saeed Sattar Beglou Hesabfa Accounting hesabfa-accounting allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Hesabfa Accounting: from n/a through <= 2.2.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hesabfa Accounting allows attackers to trick authenticated users into executing unintended actions by forcing their browser to send malicious requests, potentially leading to unauthorized data modifications or operations within the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify state-changing operationsReview the application's forms and AJAX requests that perform actions like create, update, delete, or modify data. Common endpoints include those handling invoices, contacts, inventory, or financial transactions.Affected if The application lacks anti-CSRF tokens on these operations
-
Inspect form submissions for CSRF tokensExamine HTML source code of forms submitting to state-changing endpoints. Look for hidden input fields containing randomized token values (often named _token, csrf_token, or similar) in POST/PUT/DELETE requests.Affected if No anti-CSRF token field is present in forms performing sensitive operations
-
Verify Origin or Referer header validationCapture a POST request to a sensitive endpoint using a proxy (Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, or browser DevTools) and replay it with an altered Origin header (e.g., Origin: http://malicious-site.com) or removed Referer header to see if the server accepts it.Affected if The server accepts requests from unexpected origins without validation
-
Check session cookie SameSite attributeInspect session cookies in browser DevTools (Application tab > Cookies) or via Set-Cookie headers in HTTP responses. Verify if the session cookie includes the SameSite attribute set to Strict or Lax.Affected if SameSite attribute is missing or set to None without Secure flag
-
Test for CSRF vulnerability with proof-of-conceptCreate a minimal HTML page that automatically submits a form to a sensitive endpoint while the user is authenticated, hosted on a different origin. If the action executes successfully, the vulnerability exists.Affected if The malicious request executes successfully and modifies data
The environment is affected if state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF tokens, Origin/Referer validation is absent, and session cookies lack SameSite attributes, allowing forged requests from other origins to succeed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations, validate Origin/Referer headers on POST requests, and configure SameSite attributes on session cookies to prevent cross-origin request forgery.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48362 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48362 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data