CVE-2025-48386
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGit is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals. The wincred credential helper uses a static buffer (target) as a unique key for storing and comparing against internal storage. This credential helper does not properly bounds check the available space remaining in the buffer before appending to it with wcsncat(), leading to potential buffer overflows. This vulnerability is fixed in v2.43.7, v2.44.4, v2.45.4, v2.46.4, v2.47.3, v2.48.2, v2.49.1, and v2.50.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGit's wincred credential helper on Windows uses a static buffer (target) as a unique key for credential storage and comparison. The code does not properly bounds-check available space before appending to this buffer using wcsncat(), allowing potential buffer overflows when credential data exceeds the buffer size.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Windows environmentVerify the operating system is Windows. Run 'uname -s' or check system properties. The wincred helper only exists on Windows.Affected if The system is running Windows with Git installed.
-
Identify Git versionRun 'git --version' to obtain the installed Git version number.Affected if The installed version is earlier than v2.43.7, v2.44.4, v2.45.4, v2.46.4, v2.47.3, v2.48.2, v2.49.1, or v2.50.1 in their respective release branches.
-
Check credential helper configurationRun 'git config --global credential.helper' to see which credential helper is configured. Also check 'git config --global credential.<name>.helper' for any helper-specific settings.Affected if The configured credential helper is 'wincred' or uses the Windows credential storage subsystem.
-
Verify wincred is in useInspect Git configuration files (global: %USERPROFILE%\.gitconfig or ~/.gitconfig on Windows) for entries under the [credential] section that reference wincred or Windows credential storage.Affected if The [credential] section in Git config specifies wincred as the helper or relies on default Windows credential handling.
A user is affected if they are on Windows, running a Git version earlier than the fixed releases, and have wincred or Windows credential handling enabled as the Git credential helper.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Git to version v2.43.7, v2.44.4, v2.45.4, v2.46.4, v2.47.3, v2.48.2, v2.49.1, or v2.50.1. This is a medium-severity issue affecting Windows credential handling workflows.
v2.50.1 (or latest patch version of your current release branch)
- 1. Determine the current Git version by running: git --version
- 2. Identify which release branch your current version belongs to (e.g., v2.43.x, v2.44.x, v2.45.x, etc.)
- 3. Upgrade Git to the latest patch release for your release branch, or upgrade to the latest stable release v2.50.1
- 4. On Windows: Download and install the latest Git for Windows from git-scm.com or use a package manager like winget (winget install Git.Git), Chocolatey (choco upgrade git), or Scoop (scoop update git)
- 5. On Linux: Use your distribution's package manager (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get upgrade git, yum update git, dnf update git, etc.)
- 6. On macOS: Use Homebrew (brew upgrade git) or MacPorts (sudo port upgrade git)
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: git --version
- 8. Confirm the installed version is one of the fixed releases: v2.43.7, v2.44.4, v2.45.4, v2.46.4, v2.47.3, v2.48.2, v2.49.1, or v2.50.1
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48386 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48386 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data