CVE-2025-48499
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in FUJIFILM Business Innovation MFPs. A specially crafted IPP (Internet Printing Protocol) or LPD (Line Printer Daemon) packet may cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on an affected MFP. Resetting the MFP is required to recover from the denial-of-service (DoS) condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in FUJIFILM Business Innovation MFPs triggered by specially crafted IPP or LPD packets causes a denial-of-service condition requiring manual MFP reset to recover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the MFP device modelCheck the device web interface, print a configuration page, or query the device's SNMP/management interface to confirm it is a FUJIFILM Business Innovation multifunction printer. Look for manufacturer branding indicating 'FUJIFILM Business Innovation' or legacy 'Xerox' branding used by Fujifilm in some regions.Affected if The device is a FUJIFILM Business Innovation MFP model.
-
Determine if IPP service is enabledAccess the MFP web admin interface (usually via HTTP/HTTPS on the device IP), navigate to Network Settings or Services configuration, and locate the IPP (Internet Printing Protocol) service setting. Alternatively, check by attempting to connect to port 631 (IPP standard port) or the device's configured IPP port.Affected if IPP printing service is enabled on the MFP.
-
Determine if LPD service is enabledAccess the MFP web admin interface, navigate to Network Settings or Print Services configuration, and verify the LPD/LPR (Line Printer Daemon) service status. Alternatively, test connectivity to port 515 (standard LPD port) on the device IP address.Affected if LPD printing service is enabled on the MFP.
-
Verify network accessibility of IPP and LPD portsFrom a workstation on the same network, use telnet, netcat, or simple port scanning tools (e.g., nmap) to check if ports 631 (IPP) and 515 (LPD) are open and reachable on the MFP IP address. Check firewall rules or ACLs that may permit or block these services.Affected if IPP or LPD ports are accessible from untrusted network segments.
A FUJIFILM Business Innovation MFP with IPP or LPD services enabled and reachable over the network is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to IPP and LPD services on affected MFPs (e.g., via firewall rules or ACLs); apply vendor patches when released.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48499 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48499 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data