CVE-2025-48636
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn openFile of BugreportContentProvider.java, there is a possible way to read and write unauthorized files due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Android's BugreportContentProvider allows local attackers to read and write files outside the intended directory through the openFile method. By using path traversal sequences (such as ../), an attacker can escalate privileges locally without requiring user interaction or additional execution privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version (or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shell)Affected if Version is exactly 16.0 (Android 16.0)
-
Verify BugreportContentProvider existsCheck for the presence of BugreportContentProvider in the system. On a rooted device, search for BugreportContentProvider.java in /system/framework or /system/priv-app directories, or check for the provider in AndroidManifest.xml files within the Android system imageAffected if BugreportContentProvider is present and accessible on the device
-
Confirm provider is enabledCheck if the BugreportContentProvider is enabled in the system configuration. This can be verified through the content provider registry or by examining if apps can query content://com.android.bugreport.provider/ paths (requires testing or reviewing system configuration files)Affected if The provider is enabled and accepts file path arguments without additional restrictions
-
Test for path traversal accessibilityAn app with appropriate permissions could attempt to access files outside the intended bugreport directory via content://com.android.bugreport.provider/ openFile method with paths like '../etc/passwd' - check if the system allows such access patternsAffected if The openFile method accepts and processes path traversal sequences (..) in the file path argument
A device is affected if it runs Android version 16.0 AND has the BugreportContentProvider enabled, allowing unvalidated path traversal through the openFile method.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Android's monthly security patch which includes proper path validation and sanitization in BugreportContentProvider to prevent unauthorized file access. Verify that file access is restricted to intended bugreport directories only.
Android 16.0.1 or later / March 2025 Android Security Patch Level
- 1. Check the current Android version and security patch level on the affected device by navigating to Settings > About Phone > Version Number or Settings > Security & Privacy > Security update
- 2. Navigate to Settings > System > Software Update (or Settings > About Phone > Software Update) to check for available updates
- 3. Download and install any available Android security updates or system updates
- 4. Verify the device is running Android 16.0.1 or later, or ensure the security patch level is March 2025 or later to confirm the vulnerability is patched
- 5. After updating, you may optionally verify the BugreportContentProvider behavior through security testing if you have a managed device program
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48636 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48636 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data