AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2025-48646

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In executeRequest of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible launch anywhere due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an Android framework vulnerability in ActivityStarter.java where the executeRequest method fails to properly validate activity launch requests, allowing a confused deputy attack. An attacker with limited access could potentially launch arbitrary activities with elevated privileges by tricking a privileged component into launching activities on their behalf.

MitigationThis requires a fix in the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) framework code to add proper authorization checks in the ActivityStarter.executeRequest method to prevent unauthorized activity launches. Users should apply Android security patches as they become available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 14.0= 15.0= 16.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the Android version
    Go to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run `getprop ro.build.version.release` via ADB shell
    Affected if The version is 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 specifically (exact match)
  2. Check the security patch level
    Go to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level, or run `getprop ro.build.version.security_patch` via ADB shell
    Affected if The security patch level is earlier than the CVE fix date (the device has not received the corresponding Android security update)
  3. Verify if the ActivityStarter component accepts unvalidated launch requests
    This requires reviewing the AOSP framework code at frameworks/base/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityStarter.java for the executeRequest method. A grep search for "executeRequest" in that file can show if proper validation exists.
    Affected if The executeRequest method lacks proper authorization checks before launching activities (code inspection required)
  4. Check for apps with suspicious activity launch permissions
    Review installed applications for those with permission to launch activities on behalf of other apps, particularly any suspicious or untrusted apps granted such permissions.
    Affected if A limited-privilege app exists that could potentially trigger a confused deputy attack by tricking a privileged component

You are affected if your device runs Android 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 and has not received the security patch that addresses this vulnerability in the ActivityStarter.executeRequest method.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

This requires a fix in the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) framework code to add proper authorization checks in the ActivityStarter.executeRequest method to prevent unauthorized activity launches. Users should apply Android security patches as they become available.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48646 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48646 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data