CVE-2025-48647
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn cpm_fwtp_msg_handler of cpm/google/lib/tracepoint/cpm_fwtp_ipc.c, there is a possible memory overwrite due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory overwrite vulnerability exists in cpm_fwtp_msg_handler in the CPM tracepoint IPC code due to improper input validation. The lack of bounds checking on message data allows a local attacker to overwrite memory and escalate privileges to a higher level without requiring additional execution privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the device runs Google AndroidCheck system properties: run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' and 'getprop ro.product.model' to verify the OS is Google AndroidAffected if The device is running any version of Google Android, as all versions are affected by this CVE
-
Identify if CPM tracepoint IPC component existsSearch for the cpm_fwtp_msg_handler symbol or CPM-related kernel modules: check /proc/kallsyms for 'cpm_fwtp_msg_handler' or look for cpm-related kernel objects in /system/lib/modules or /vendor/lib/modulesAffected if The vulnerable function cpm_fwtp_msg_handler exists in the kernel or loaded modules, indicating the affected code is present
-
Check if CPM IPC is actively used or loadedExamine kernel boot logs (dmesg or /proc/bootmsg) for CPM-related messages, or check /sys/kernel/debug/cpm entries if the debugfs interface existsAffected if The CPM tracepoint IPC subsystem is initialized and running, meaning the vulnerable code path can be triggered
-
Verify kernel configuration for CPM supportIf kernel source is available, check kernel config for CONFIG_CPM or CONFIG_CPM_TRACEPOINT options in /proc/config.gz or the kernel configuration fileAffected if CPM tracepoint support is enabled in the kernel configuration, compiling the vulnerable code into the kernel image
-
Inspect for any available CVE-related indicatorsReview system logs (logcat -d) and kernel logs for any error messages related to cpm_fwtp_msg_handler, memory corruption events, or IPC buffer overflows since these may indicate exploitation attemptsAffected if Any log evidence shows crashes or errors originating from the cpm_fwtp_msg_handler function or CPM IPC handling code
A user is affected if the device runs Google Android and the vulnerable cpm_fwtp_msg_handler component in the CPM tracepoint IPC code is present and active on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and bounds checking in the cpm_fwtp_msg_handler function before processing message data to prevent memory corruption.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48647 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48647 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data