CVE-2025-48725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to modify memory or crash processes. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuTS hero h5.3.2.3354 build 20251225 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in QNAP NAS operating systems that requires an authenticated user account before exploitation. A remote attacker who has obtained valid credentials can trigger the overflow to modify memory contents or cause denial of service by crashing processes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= 5.2.1.2930= 5.2.2.2950= 5.2.3.3006= 5.2.4.3070= 5.2.4.3079= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860= h5.2.1.2929= h5.2.1.2940= h5.2.2.2952= h5.2.3.3006= h5.2.4.3070CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QTS versionAccess the QNAP admin console and navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware, or run `cat /proc/version` via SSH to retrieve the installed QTS build numberAffected if The build number matches any of these: 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823, 5.2.0.2851, 5.2.0.2860, 5.2.1.2930, 5.2.2.2950, 5.2.3.3006, 5.2.4.3070, or 5.2.4.3079
-
Identify QuTS Hero versionAccess the QNAP admin console and navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware, or run `cat /proc/version` via SSH to retrieve the installed QuTS Hero build numberAffected if The build number matches any of these: h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823, h5.2.0.2851, h5.2.0.2860, h5.2.1.2929, h5.2.1.2940, h5.2.2.2952, h5.2.3.3006, or h5.2.4.3070
-
Verify remote access configurationCheck if the QNAP device has remote management ports (HTTP/HTTPS for admin console) exposed to the network or internet via router port forwarding or firewall rulesAffected if Remote admin access is enabled and reachable from untrusted networks, allowing a remote attacker to attempt authentication
-
Audit user accountsReview the list of local users in Control Panel > Privilege > Users, or run `getent passwd` via SSH to enumerate all accountsAffected if There are any user accounts present, since the attacker needs valid credentials for at least one account to exploit the buffer overflow
A device is affected if it runs any of the listed QTS or QuTS Hero versions AND has network accessibility that allows an attacker to authenticate with valid credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected QNAP devices to QuTS hero h5.3.2.3354 build 20251225 or later. Additionally, enforce strong credential policies and monitor for unauthorized account creation to prevent the prerequisite access needed for exploitation.
QuTS hero h5.3.2.3354 build 20251225 or later
- Identify your current QNAP operating system version (QTS or QuTS hero) via the Control Panel > System > Firmware version
- For QuTS hero systems: Upgrade to version h5.3.2.3354 build 20251225 or later to remediate the buffer overflow vulnerability
- For QTS systems: Monitor QNAP security advisories for corresponding fix releases as the official fix reference only lists QuTS hero h5.3.2.3354
- After upgrading, verify the new firmware version matches or exceeds the fixed release
- Ensure user account security best practices are followed - limit the number of user accounts and enforce strong passwords, as the vulnerability requires a valid user account to exploit
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data