PmbApplication · Sigb

CVE-2025-48742

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.0.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The installer in SIGB PMB before and fixed in v.8.0.1.2 allows remote code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The SIGB PMB library management system installer contains a vulnerability that allows remote code execution, likely due to insufficient validation or insecure handling of user-supplied data during the installation process. This critical flaw (CVSS 9.8) enables attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the target system with high privileges, potentially leading to complete system compromise.

MitigationUpdate SIGB PMB to version 8.0.1.2 or later. If running instances cannot be immediately updated, restrict network access to installation endpoints and ensure the installer runs in an isolated environment with minimal privileges.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PmbApplication
Affected:< 8.0.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if SIGB PMB is installed
    Look for PMB installation directories, running services, or web application instances. Check common installation paths or use system package managers if available.
    Affected if SIGB PMB is present on the system and was installed using a version prior to 8.0.1.2
  2. Determine installed PMB version
    Locate and read version files, configuration files, or check the PMB web interface for version information. Compare against the vulnerable range of versions below 8.0.1.2.
    Affected if The installed version is below 8.0.1.2
  3. Check if installer files are web-accessible
    Search for installation script files (install, setup, or similar) in web-accessible directories. Attempt to access common installer paths via HTTP if the web server is known.
    Affected if Installer files remain accessible on the web server and could be re-run
  4. Review installation logs for version used
    Examine PMB installation logs, backup files, or database records that may indicate which installer version was originally used.
    Affected if Installation records show version below 8.0.1.2 was used

You are affected if SIGB PMB is installed with a version below 8.0.1.2, or if installer files from a vulnerable version are still accessible on the system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.0.1.2 or later
Fixed in 8.0.1.2
Interim mitigation

Update SIGB PMB to version 8.0.1.2 or later. If running instances cannot be immediately updated, restrict network access to installation endpoints and ensure the installer runs in an isolated environment with minimal privileges.

Recommended fix High confidence

8.0.1.2

  1. Back up the current PMB installation and database before starting the upgrade process
  2. Download PMB version 8.0.1.2 from the official SIGB sources (forge.sigb.net or www.sigb.net)
  3. Follow the official PMB upgrade documentation to install version 8.0.1.2
  4. Verify the installation was successful and the version is correctly reported as 8.0.1.2
  5. Test that the application functions normally after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Pmb Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48742 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48742 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data