CVE-2025-48820
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows AppX Deployment Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Windows AppX Deployment Service contains a link following vulnerability where symbolic links are not properly resolved before file access, allowing a local authenticated attacker to manipulate file system operations and achieve privilege escalation to elevated SYSTEM-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21073< 10.0.14393.8246< 10.0.17763.7558< 10.0.19044.6093< 10.0.19045.6093< 10.0.22621.5624< 10.0.22631.5624< 10.0.26100.4652CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact build number, then compare against the affected version ranges: Windows 10 1507 (>=10.0.10240.21073), 1607 (>=10.0.14393.8246), 1809 (>=10.0.17763.7558), 21h2 (>=10.0.19044.6093), 22h2 (>=10.0.19045.6093); Windows 11 22h2 (>=10.0.22621.5624), 23h2 (>=10.0.22631.5624), 24h2 (>=10.0.26100.4652)Affected if The installed version is LOWER than any of the listed thresholds for the corresponding Windows release and build
-
Confirm AppX Deployment Service statusOpen Services (services.msc) and locate the 'AppX Deployment Service' (AppXSvc), or run 'Get-Service AppXSvc' in PowerShell to check if the service is present and runningAffected if The AppX Deployment Service is running and the Windows version is vulnerable as determined in step 1
-
Verify current user contextRun 'whoami /all' or check User Account Control (UAC) status to determine if the current user is a standard non-privileged user versus an administratorAffected if The current user is a standard (non-admin) authenticated local user, which is the attacker profile for this vulnerability
-
Audit for symbolic link operations in AppX directoriesUse Sysmon or Windows Event Logging to monitor for creation of symbolic links (event ID 4688 with 'mklink' command) in user-accessible directories under %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows\Apps or %ProgramFiles%\WindowsApps, or inspect these directories manually for suspicious symbolic linksAffected if Symbolic links exist in AppX-related directories that were created by a non-privileged user, indicating potential exploitation activity
A system is affected if it runs a Windows version lower than the patched builds AND has the AppX Deployment Service enabled, allowing a local authenticated non-admin user to potentially exploit the symlink handling for privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2107310.0.14393.824610.0.17763.7558
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict local non-privileged user access to the system and monitor for suspicious AppX deployment activity.
Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.21073 | Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8246 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.7558 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6093 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6093 | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.5624 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.5624 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.4652
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update and click 'Check for updates'
- Install all available security updates for your Windows version
- Restart the computer if prompted to complete the installation
- Verify the update was applied by reviewing the update history in Windows Update settings
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-48820 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-48820 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data