CVE-2025-49181
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to missing authorization of an API endpoint, unauthorized users can send HTTP GET requests to gather sensitive information. An attacker could also send HTTP POST requests to modify the log files’ root path as well as the TCP ports the service is running on, leading to a Denial of Service attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn API endpoint lacks authorization checks, allowing unauthenticated attackers to send HTTP GET requests to retrieve sensitive information. Attackers can also send HTTP POST requests to modify log file root paths and TCP ports, causing denial of service by disrupting service configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Sick Media Server is installedCheck for running processes named 'sickmediaserver' or look in common installation directories such as /opt/sickmediaserver, C:\Program Files\Sick Media Server, or /usr/local/sickmediaserver. Also check for services listening on common media server ports.Affected if Sick Media Server is running or installed on the system
-
Check API endpoint exposureIdentify the API endpoint URL (commonly at /api/, /api/v1/, or /endpoint) by reviewing configuration files in the installation directory such as config.json, settings.conf, or web.config.Affected if The API endpoint is accessible over the network (not bound to localhost only)
-
Test unauthenticated GET accessSend an HTTP GET request to the API endpoint without providing any authentication credentials or headers. For example: curl -v http://<server>:<port>/api/ or use a browser to navigate to the endpoint.Affected if The API returns HTTP 200 with data or sensitive information without requiring authentication
-
Test unauthenticated POST accessSend an HTTP POST request to the API endpoint attempting to modify configuration, such as changing log_path or port settings. Example: curl -X POST -d 'log_path=/tmp/test&port=9999' http://<server>:<port>/api/config'Affected if The API accepts the POST request and modifies configuration without requiring authentication
If Sick Media Server is running and the API endpoint responds to unauthenticated GET or POST requests, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-49181.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization validation on the vulnerable API endpoint to ensure only permitted users can access data or modify configuration settings.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49181 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data