CVE-2025-49196
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways or spoof identities of other users or devices, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA service has been configured to support deprecated and unsafe TLS versions (such as TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1) which contain known cryptographic weaknesses. An attacker positioned network-wise could exploit this to perform man-in-the-middle attacks, intercept sensitive data in transit, or impersonate legitimate services, resulting in confidentiality and integrity compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Sick Field Analytics TLS configurationIdentify configuration files, registry keys, or application settings that control TLS version support for the Sick Field Analytics service. Check common locations such as the application's config directory, Windows registry under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols, or service-specific configuration files.Affected if TLS version settings are found in locations accessible to the service and TLS 1.0 or 1.1 is permitted.
-
Inspect TLS version settingsExamine the configuration for parameters that control TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 enablement. Look for flags such as 'Enabled', 'DisabledByDefault', or protocol-specific settings under SCHANNEL or in application config files.Affected if TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 is explicitly set to Enabled, or if DisabledByDefault is set to 0 for these protocols.
-
Test service TLS version acceptanceUse a network scanning tool such as nmap with the ssl-enum-ciphers script (nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 <target>) or openssl s_client with specific TLS version flags to query which TLS versions the Sick Field Analytics service accepts.Affected if The service responds and accepts connections using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1.
-
Verify client-side TLS configurationCheck client applications and integrations that connect to Sick Field Analytics for their TLS configuration. Review config files, registry settings, or application code to confirm which TLS versions they are configured to use when connecting.Affected if Any client is configured to use TLS 1.0 or 1.1 when connecting to the service.
If the Sick Field Analytics service accepts TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 connections either through its configuration or via network testing, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable support for deprecated TLS versions (TLS 1.0/1.1) at the service level and enforce TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 with strong cipher suites. Verify that all client applications and integrations support the minimum TLS version before deployment.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49196 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data