CVE-2025-49268
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Soft8Soft LLC Verge3D verge3d allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Verge3D: from n/a through <= 4.9.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in Verge3D allows exploitation due to incorrectly configured Access Control Security Levels, potentially permitting unauthorized access to sensitive functionality or data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Verge3D installationSearch for Verge3D application files, typically found in web server directories (e.g., /verge3d/, /apps/, or custom application folders). Check for v3d.js, v3d_app.js, or app configuration files.Affected if Verge3D is installed and accessible in the environment
-
Identify security configuration filesLook for configuration files named app_config.json, security.json, or similar within the Verge3D application directory. These typically contain accessControl, securityLevel, or permissions settings.Affected if A security configuration file exists and is accessible
-
Inspect Access Control Security LevelsOpen the security configuration file and examine the securityLevel, accessControl, or authorization settings. Verify whether sensitive endpoints/functions have securityLevel set to a value requiring authentication (e.g., 'user', 'admin', or similar).Affected if Security levels are set to a permissive or unauthenticated state for sensitive operations
-
Check for unrestricted sensitive endpointsReview the application configuration for exposed functions, data exports, or API endpoints. Identify if critical functions (data retrieval, file access, user management) lack authorization requirements.Affected if Sensitive functionality is accessible without authentication or with insufficient access controls
-
Test sensitive function accessIf possible, attempt to access known sensitive functions or endpoints (e.g., data export, configuration reading) without providing credentials. Compare behavior against the documented expected behavior.Affected if Sensitive functions execute or return data without authorization credentials
A user is affected if Verge3D is deployed with Access Control Security Levels configured to permit unauthenticated or insufficiently authorized access to sensitive functionality or data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview and properly configure the access control security levels in the Verge3D deployment according to vendor documentation, ensuring all sensitive endpoints and functions require appropriate authorization.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49268 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49268 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data