CVE-2025-49279
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in unfoldwp Blogvy blogvy allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Blogvy: from n/a through <= 1.0.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Blogvy plugin <= 1.0.7 contains a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability where user-supplied input is not properly validated before being used in include/require statements. This allows attackers to include arbitrary local files from the server, potentially leading to sensitive data exposure (e.g., configuration files, credentials) or remote code execution if writable paths can be accessed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Blogvy plugin is installedCheck your WordPress plugin directory or access the plugins admin panel to confirm the Blogvy plugin is presentAffected if The Blogvy plugin is installed on the WordPress site
-
Determine installed Blogvy versionAccess the plugin settings page in WordPress admin, or inspect the plugin header in the main plugin file (typically includes 'Version: x.x.x' comment)Affected if The installed version is 1.0.7 or lower, or the version cannot be determined (assume affected)
-
Locate the vulnerable file inclusion codeSearch the plugin source files for include, require, include_once, or require_once statements that use variables without sanitization (e.g., include($var), require($_GET['param']))Affected if User-controlled parameters are used directly in include/require statements without validation
-
Identify exposed input vectorsReview plugin PHP files for parameters passed via GET, POST, or request variables that flow into file inclusion functionsAffected if URL parameters or form inputs can be manipulated to control which files are included
-
Test for LFI exploitabilityIf the vulnerable parameter is identified, attempt to include a known local file (e.g., ../../wp-config.php or /etc/passwd) using the affected parameter in a requestAffected if The server returns content from the targeted file, confirming arbitrary file inclusion is possible
You are affected if the Blogvy plugin version is 1.0.7 or lower AND user-supplied input can control which files are included via include/require statements without validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation with allowlisting for file paths, avoid using user input directly in include/require statements, and upgrade to a patched version if available. Web application firewalls (WAF) can provide temporary mitigation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49279 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49279 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data