CVE-2025-49323
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Themefic Hydra Booking hydra-booking allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Hydra Booking: from n/a through <= 1.1.10.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Themefic Hydra Booking WordPress plugin allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data theft, or complete site compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Hydra Booking plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins. Locate 'Hydra Booking' by Themefic in the list. Note the installed version number displayed next to the plugin name.Affected if The plugin is installed and active on the WordPress site.
-
Compare installed version to affected versionsReview the plugin version you recorded against any version information provided by Themefic or WordPress security advisories. If no specific range is published, treat the plugin as potentially affected if unpatched.Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version or falls within an unpatched range.
-
Identify plugin components accepting user inputInspect the plugin directory (wp-content/plugins/hydra-booking/) for files handling HTTP parameters such as $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST. Focus on files in the /includes or /classes folders that process booking, form, or search functionalities.Affected if The plugin contains code that processes user-supplied input without visible sanitization or prepared statements.
-
Verify database query implementationOpen identified PHP files and search for direct SQL queries using $wpdb->prepare, $wpdb->query, or similar. Confirm whether placeholders (%s, %d) are used consistently or if user input is concatenated directly into query strings.Affected if Database queries concatenate or embed raw user input without parameterized queries.
-
Review application logs for SQL injection attemptsCheck Apache/Nginx error logs and WordPress debug logs for unusual SQL syntax, UNION SELECT statements, or common injection payloads targeting Hydra Booking endpoints.Affected if Logs contain suspicious SQL fragments or injection patterns routed through Hydra Booking URLs.
A user is affected if Hydra Booking is installed, the version is unpatched, and the plugin processes user input into database queries without proper sanitization or prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Hydra Booking to the latest version when available; immediately audit and refactor all database queries to use parameterized queries (prepared statements) with proper input validation and escaping.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49323 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49323 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data